The bar chart shows the number of visitors to three London museums between 2007 and 2012
The bar graph gives information on the annual number of visits (in millions) to the National Gallery, the Victoria and Albert museum and the British museum from 2007 to 2012
Overall, it is evident that the population of tourists who visited Victoria and Albert were equal in two consecutive years, however, National Gallery was the most popular site in the stipulated time frame.
In the year 2007, about 6 million individuals went to National Gallery which was the least toured museum in the year, as compared to about 7 and 8 million individuals who visited British and Victoria and Albert respectively.
British museum experienced a sharp decline in foot traffic (6 million) in both 2008 and 2009, which was then followed by a steady increase that reached its peak in 2012, marking 14 million foot counts yearly. The growth trend is obvious in the National Gallery visitors log which firstly showed 6 million individuals in 2007 but more than doubled population that soared to 16 million in 2012.
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district 56
- Oil production capacity 73
- The bar chart shows the number of visitors to three London museums between 2007 and 2012 61
- The chart below gives information about the UK's ageing population in 1985 and makes predictions for 2035. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...formation on the annual number of visits in millions to the National Gallery, th...
^^
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the annual number of visits in millions to the National Gallery, the Victoria an...
^^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erienced a sharp decline in foot traffic 6 million in both 2008 and 2009, which ...
^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sharp decline in foot traffic 6 million in both 2008 and 2009, which was then fo...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'so', 'then']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.266666666667 0.268076937826 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.105555555556 0.116061578633 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0777777777778 0.0759168565197 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0388888888889 0.0366838410393 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0111111111111 0.0131127313244 85% => OK
Prepositions: 0.111111111111 0.155750635184 71% => OK
Participles: 0.0166666666667 0.0379272487307 44% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.55747426247 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0277777777778 0.0210936926555 132% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0888888888889 0.0948980150116 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0388888888889 0.00967000014798 402% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1006.0 1161.00487805 87% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.9 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9880952381 5.90752243213 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73763899035 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.404761904762 0.337110787985 120% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.297619047619 0.247514529752 120% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.154761904762 0.171178102325 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0595238095238 0.112407865282 53% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55747426247 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.546246751206 107% => OK
Word variations: 51.2301856377 49.3433353143 104% => OK
How many sentences: 4.0 8.93414634146 45% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 42.0 23.0094962315 183% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 78.0236342399 42.9750493124 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 251.5 135.714022679 185% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 42.0 23.0094962315 183% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.5 0.689975730869 217% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.48048780488 270% => OK
Readability: 71.7619047619 47.7609492067 150% => OK
Elegance: 2.53571428571 2.94281807926 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32161339202 0.418131533498 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.288077565441 0.181151798455 159% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.129292680936 0.0850326197045 152% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.901914564403 0.706616315825 128% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.120295834199 0.157042692854 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207110549244 0.228904883108 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122242995759 0.108899403657 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.344197627081 0.367819155151 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0229128513841 0.0812612215331 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245540372324 0.316326947829 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120183849317 0.0921553760075 130% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.08536585366 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.02926829268 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 4.0 7.1512195122 56% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.