The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.
The graph represents the amount of three different types of foods, namely; meat, salt and fish, were consumed by Chinese from 1985 to 2010. Overall, the fish consumption was popular throughout the period given. It is interesting to note that, both fish and meat consumption increased with its consumption, while salt was the only food that the amount of consumption decreased substantially.
Looking in details of fish consumption in the period of 1985 to 1995, which amount was recorded at 600 grams despite the periodic fluctuation (in 1990 its consumption increased to 700 grams and fell back to 600 grams). Meanwhile, meat was the lowest consumption in China of 100 grams in 1985 before it stably increased to 200 grams (nearly) by 1995. In contrast, salt experienced a declining trend from 500 grams in 1985 to around 350 grams in 1995.
From 2000, the amount of consumption for fish continued to rise remarkably to reach at close to 900 grams in 2010, whereas the salt with its consumption decreased continuously to end at 200 grams in 2010. This figure recorded at the same as the amount of meat consumed in 2010 (of 200 grams).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Kien Vu | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | windingsilverfish | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-04 | ochirvaani | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Vadim | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | Vadim | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996. 73
- The pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made. 78
- The table below shows the results of a survey on workplace complaints in Germany in 2001. 67
- Nowadays people live in societies that consumer goods have become cheaper Do you think the advantages of consumer goods being cheaper outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'look', 'whereas', 'while', 'in contrast']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.205607476636 0.268076937826 77% => OK
Verbs: 0.130841121495 0.116061578633 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0560747663551 0.0759168565197 74% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0420560747664 0.0366838410393 115% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0233644859813 0.0131127313244 178% => OK
Prepositions: 0.18691588785 0.155750635184 120% => OK
Participles: 0.0467289719626 0.0379272487307 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75205601458 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0514018691589 0.0210936926555 244% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0747663551402 0.0948980150116 79% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00467289719626 0.00967000014798 48% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1130.0 1161.00487805 97% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.9 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82474226804 5.90752243213 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73763899035 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.29381443299 0.337110787985 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.20618556701 0.247514529752 83% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.170103092784 0.171178102325 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.139175257732 0.112407865282 124% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75205601458 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505154639175 0.546246751206 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 43.2169948104 49.3433353143 88% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 8.93414634146 90% => OK
Sentence length: 24.25 23.0094962315 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2772793253 42.9750493124 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.25 135.714022679 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 23.0094962315 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 0.689975730869 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 44.868556701 47.7609492067 94% => OK
Elegance: 2.2380952381 2.94281807926 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334090941908 0.418131533498 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.263541383371 0.181151798455 145% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0804598013092 0.0850326197045 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.730713326186 0.706616315825 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.110275587145 0.157042692854 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198950383514 0.228904883108 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466342787732 0.108899403657 43% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.412444739913 0.367819155151 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.111198809787 0.0812612215331 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263754674392 0.316326947829 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615074754524 0.0921553760075 67% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.02926829268 99% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.