The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006.
The chart represents the proportion of international graduates in eight different Canadian universities from 2001 to 2006.
Overall, the proportion of international graduates increased. The highest international graduates were New Brunswick and Nova Scotia in both periods. It is interesting to note that, the international students graduated from British Columbia were raised the most in its proportion.
Looking in details of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia had the highest international graduates in both years. New Brunswick increased with the percentage of international graduates from 8% in 2001 to 13% in 2006, while Nova Scotia rose with a percentage of international graduates of 7% in 2001 to 11% in 2006. Meanwhile, the rest of universities recorded at above 5% of international graduates in 2006 compared to those of below 5% in 2001.
It is interesting to note that, Quebec and British Columbia experienced a swapping the position of the third highest international graduates from 2001 to 2006. In 2001, Quebec universities had the 3rd highest proportion of international graduates of about 6% but the proportion of international graduates reached at below 10% by 2006. In opposed to Quebec universities, British Columbia had around 4% of international graduates in 2001 and by 2006; this grew substantially to over 10% of international students graduated from.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-25 | Vuthungan | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | dangchan21 | 78 | view |
| 2021-04-19 | tranuyen | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | fachryadul92 | 11 | view |
- Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments Others contest those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit What is your position Discuss bot 94
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers. 73
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010. 73
- It is generally discussed among the public that extreme sports such as sky diving and rock climbing should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 77
- The graph below shows a percentage who drank each unit group on heaviest drinking day by age group, 2014 in the UK. 61
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'look', 'third', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25 0.268076937826 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.104166666667 0.116061578633 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0916666666667 0.0759168565197 121% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0166666666667 0.0366838410393 45% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0125 0.0131127313244 95% => OK
Prepositions: 0.2 0.155750635184 128% => OK
Participles: 0.0375 0.0379272487307 99% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.45230174325 2.65546596893 130% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0375 0.0210936926555 178% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0791666666667 0.0948980150116 83% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.00967000014798 0% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1378.0 1161.00487805 119% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.9 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.5 5.90752243213 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73763899035 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.382075471698 0.337110787985 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.339622641509 0.247514529752 137% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.287735849057 0.171178102325 168% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.231132075472 0.112407865282 206% => Too many words length more than 8 chars.
Word Length SD: 3.45230174325 2.65546596893 130% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.419811320755 0.546246751206 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 35.6696627399 49.3433353143 72% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 8.93414634146 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.2 23.0094962315 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.157965661 42.9750493124 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.8 135.714022679 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 23.0094962315 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.689975730869 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 55.1622641509 47.7609492067 115% => OK
Elegance: 3.65625 2.94281807926 124% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.52656663194 0.418131533498 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.234998261288 0.181151798455 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.101176648127 0.0850326197045 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.74815241861 0.706616315825 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.123154689896 0.157042692854 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.317808268556 0.228904883108 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802500531031 0.108899403657 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.488373736854 0.367819155151 133% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0811465581531 0.0812612215331 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.425999691817 0.316326947829 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519730918086 0.0921553760075 56% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.08536585366 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.16585365854 158% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.02926829268 165% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 7.1512195122 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.