do you agree or disagree? the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
That trips play an absolutely crucial role in spread spectrum of one's life is an undeniable fact. Should people realize the importance of quality in their travels, they will ponder over it much more scrupulously. On the one hand there is a firm belief that it is better for people to travel by their own; on the other one, many people are convinced to travel in a group with a tour leader. This issue has recently been the topic of debate among most psychologists and tour agencies. In the existence of all points of view, I do believe that the two paramount objectives of traveling in a group with a guide are cost efficiency and making new friends. Tour-leader effects on the quality of trip could be noted as another rationale.
To begin with, it is incontrovertibly axiomatic that travelling in a group is more economical. In other words, in tours, travelers could share the expenses with others and they could take their trip by spending less money. With this in mind, one particularly salient example of cost efficiency is price of tickets-- when agencies hire a vehicle or they take airplane or train wholly, the cost of tickets become to be less. Thus, nobody could overlook the fact that on numerous occasions group-trips lead to be economical.
The second reason why I advocate this point of view, lies in the fact that in tours we can find new friends with different backgrounds and it is an honorable value. That is to say, most psychologists believe that different people as a friend have a significant role in everyone's life; because they can learn lots of valuable things from them and also they can compensate part of their emotional needs. To elucidate, I am a social person and I need to have more friends in my life and it is a well-established fact that in tours there are lots of opportunity to find sufficient friend. Therefore, on no account can we underrate the efficacy of traveling by a tour with regards to enter of new persons as a friend to our life.
Having discussed this issue from this point of view, I am going to empower it by the following discussion. There is a school of thought that tour-guides help traveler to make most of his/her travel. It cannot be denied that tour leaders are familiar with different places that we want to see them and they can manage us to optimize our trip. It can be said that managing time during the trip is a strongly important fact. As a result, tour leader is a key point in lots of travels.
By taking all above-mentioned arguments into the consideration, the following conclusion could be drawn about this issue. Inasmuch trips have profound effects on the complexity of everyone's life and society, underestimating the importance of group travels with a leader is not logical. Attending to this issue meticulously contributes to having wonderful trip, and could revolutionize miscellaneous aspects of travelling industry.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 502 350
No. of Characters: 2348 1500
No. of Different Words: 242 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.733 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.677 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.822 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 151 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 81 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 61 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.818 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.44 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.318 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.283 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.283 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.081 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...tely crucial role in spread spectrum of ones life is an undeniable fact. Should peop...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'as a result', 'in other words', 'to begin with', 'that is to say']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238532110092 0.229887763892 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.155963302752 0.158761421928 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0917431192661 0.0866891130778 106% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0311926605505 0.046263068375 67% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0587155963303 0.0685040099705 86% => OK
Prepositions: 0.150458715596 0.118717715034 127% => OK
Participles: 0.0403669724771 0.0351676179071 115% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87622326468 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0311926605505 0.0309702414327 101% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.097247706422 0.0887237588012 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0275229357798 0.0209618222197 131% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00366972477064 0.0139019557991 26% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2896.0 2387.08602151 121% => OK
No of words: 501.0 408.028673835 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78043912176 5.86048508987 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.48200974243 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.315369261477 0.338922669872 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.233532934132 0.251872472559 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.173652694611 0.174417080927 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.127744510978 0.112833075102 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87622326468 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493013972056 0.524397521467 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 57.697888189 59.2087087015 97% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6684587814 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.7727272727 20.5533526081 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9242633301 48.84282405 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.636363636 120.699889404 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7727272727 20.5533526081 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.590909090909 0.644075263715 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 46.1260206859 45.7405998639 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.74626865672 1.45489161554 120% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270636111479 0.300154397459 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0820321880413 0.103427244359 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0561936369307 0.0752933317313 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.499050940421 0.497263757937 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0899169709475 0.151897553556 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108147645729 0.114077575197 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049455411815 0.0781384742642 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.391400680221 0.336927656856 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0794981438718 0.067059652881 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19101520437 0.210909579961 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431550604984 0.0618886996521 70% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8870967742 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 15.0 8.42114695341 178% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.