tpo7
In this set of material, the reading passage claims that an international organization has proposed issuing certification to wood companies. The companies which receive this certification, will meet high ecological standards by protecting resources and recycling material and they will be able to attract their costumers by advertising, however the reading believes that American wood companies will not be willing to do it and then brings three reasons for this suggestion, however the professor finds all the reasons fragile and provides some evidences to advocate that American wood companies will tell welcome to it.
First, the reading states that American people do not usually rely on advertising; in contrast the lecture argues that American people have a high diagnostic power between two thing with high quality and poor quality. It is easy for them to distinguish the advantages of this certification.
Second, the author of reading declares that ecocertification wood will be expensive for companies and they will be forced to rise up their products' price, on the contrary the professor contends that different price between two certificated and uncertificated products may be approximately 5 percent, consequently American people will would rather select the product which is worthwhile for environment, because they are concerned about protection from their surroundings.
Third, the reading believes that American people are inclined to American companies keep up with international marketing, however for competing with foreign companies, American companies need to certification while they can sell their products in United States with a high profit; however this view is challenged by the speaker. If American companies act slowly in capturing costumers, gradually international companies enter to United State and they can have an horrible impact on American companies.
- do you agree or disagree? it is easier to become educated today than it was in the past. 81
- do you agree or disagree? people nowadays are more willing to help other people (giving food or clothing) than in the past or not. 76
- do you agree or disagree? should do students do miscellaneous things during the study as navigating on internet, listening to the music and reading book and so on, or it can hurt to their study? 73
- do you agree or disagree? teachers have to require homework from students ever day 83
- tpo39 3
Comments
Essay evaluation report
American people are inclined to American companies keep up with international marketing,
American people are inclined to American companies who keep up with international marketing,
American people are inclined to American companies keeping up with international marketing,
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 12
No. of Words: 283 250
No. of Characters: 1581 1200
No. of Different Words: 147 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.102 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.587 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.015 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 126 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 107 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 78 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 52 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 40.429 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 22.212 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.487 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.487 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.174 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 177, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'thing' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'things'.
Suggestion: things
...ave a high diagnostic power between two thing with high quality and poor quality. It ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 460, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...enter to United State and they can have an horrible impact on American companies. ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'third', 'while', 'in contrast', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252459016393 0.261695866417 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.170491803279 0.158904122519 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0950819672131 0.0723426182421 131% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0426229508197 0.0435111971325 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0426229508197 0.0277247811725 154% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118032786885 0.128828473217 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0360655737705 0.0370669169778 97% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.09742258101 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0327868852459 0.0208969081088 157% => OK
Particles: 0.00655737704918 0.00154638098197 424% => OK
Determiners: 0.0786885245902 0.128158765124 61% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0360655737705 0.0158828679856 227% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00983606557377 0.0114777025283 86% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1890.0 1645.83664459 115% => OK
No of words: 283.0 271.125827815 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.67844522968 6.08160592843 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.455830388693 0.374372842146 122% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.385159010601 0.287516216867 134% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.286219081272 0.187439937562 153% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.187279151943 0.113142543107 166% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09742258101 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540636042403 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 54.5962082407 53.8517498576 101% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0529801325 54% => OK
Sentence length: 40.4285714286 21.7502111507 186% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 149.074970866 49.3711431718 302% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 270.0 132.220823453 204% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 40.4285714286 21.7502111507 186% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.71428571429 0.878197800319 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 78.9444724886 50.5018328374 156% => OK
Elegance: 1.58974358974 1.90840788429 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.175359495859 0.142949733639 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0769456004909 0.0787303798458 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.748738972954 0.631733273073 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.205613097592 0.139662658121 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.261552162399 0.414875509568 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0337753383076 0.0530846634433 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 10.2958057395 58% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.