The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.
The line chart depicts the pollution levels in London from 1550 to 2000, which was caused by Sulphur dioxide and smoke. Overall, we can see that the levels of both pollutants show a similar trend but the figure for the level of Sulphur dioxide was higher than those of smoke in the atmosphere throughout this period.
In 1600, pollutant levels were the lowest point but over the next 100 years, the levels of sulphur dioxide increased significantly to over 750 micrograms per metre, while the levels of smoke only rose gradually to approximately 250 micrograms per metre. Next, the 200 years later, the levels of those pollutants continued to rise steadily despite there were some fluctuations. Between 1850 to 1900, the levels of sulphur dioxide and smoke reached the highest point, at about 850 micrograms per metre and nearly 500 micrograms per metre respectively.
However, by 1920, the pollutant levels had fallen sharply and these changes continued to fall with major fluctuations to nearly 0 micrograms in the following years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-16 | emat18 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Ergaya Alsout | 11 | view |
| 2016-12-12 | math | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Ergaya Alsout | 56 | view |
- Nowadays more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that is a good thing while others argue that it is not suitable. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 68
- The table below gives information about Favorite Pastimes in different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010 70
- The diagrams below show UK students responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14117647059 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63143099202 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611764705882 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6508488421 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.666666667 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257756403233 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1278344474 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04841308316 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159149481438 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588669642653 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.