The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.

The graph illustrates the average of pollution in England from 1600 to 2000. First of all, there was low level in smoking at first years and going to be high and fall down. Moreover, there was high limit in sulphur dioxide at the beginning years to smoke level then it was dropped to the lowest average.
The pollution was start in 1600 in London in smoking and Sulphur dioxide from 1 in 1600 and it is going up slightly to 400 in 1900 than it was going down steeply with fluctuate between 1920 and 1970 and plummet rapidly to 0 in 2000.
The sulphur dioxide was considerably jumped from 0 to 750 in 1600 to 1730 respectively. There has been a small decline to 650 in 1750 then it was steadily growing to the top spot it was 900 in 1850. There was a sharp drop with fluctuation in 1930 continue to 1960. The fluctuation started in about 1930 continue to 1960. Both sulphur dioxide and smoke present this trend which stated at 500 and fell to 0 in sulphur dioxide but it began at about 350 in smoke and decline at 0 too.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, moreover, then, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.27835051546 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30208747868 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489690721649 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2864852826 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2222222222 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15511943381 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744373241797 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105859301803 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132873097706 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846059496752 0.0819641961636 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.54 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.