The letter to the editor of the west lansburg news argues that the road along the edge of wetlands should not be allowed to built as it may endanger the biodiversity and population of tufted groundhog. However the letter doesn't mention the purpose for which the road has to be built,also lacks quantification and has troubled analogy.
The author of the letter mentions that it is the interest of local development to build a road along the edges of the wetland but he or she doesn't mention the purpose for which the road is to be built. The road could be built for access to the wetlands so that researchers and scientist interested in local wetlands or tufted groundhogs can reach their it would seriously undermine authors' argument. This information would have allowed the editor better insight for opposition of road.
The author of the letter presents a stat which says that sea otter population declined in a similar sanctuary after the repeal of the sanctuary's status. It would have given the editor better understanding of the graveness of the step to repeal the sanctuary's status if the author would have quantified the decline of sea otters population. Also the author derives a analogy between the sanctuary in eastern carpenteria and west lansburg based on vague terms like "similar". If the sanctuary's are similar only one of all the aspects of ecology then it would have seriously weaken the author's argument.
The letter suggests that to ensure healthy environment and help protect region's biodiversity the road shouldn't be allowed to built. The author doesn't provide the current situation of tufted groundhog's population. If after the declaration of wildlife sanctuary in the wetlands of west lansburg the population of tufted groundhog has again numbered to millions then building one access road along the edge of the land wouldn't pose much of a threat if safety precautions are taken for the biodiversity.
Thus the author of the letter fails to provide information that would've allowed the editor to better understand why the west lansburg council should not allow the road to be built on the edges of the wetlands.
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. Cambridge ielts 5, page 36
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 71
- The figure gives information about smoking habit of the UK population by age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is increase the price of fuel. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 39
- The graph below describes rainfall statistics for Somecountry. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ity and population of tufted groundhog. However the letter doesnt mention the purpose f...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...of tufted groundhog. However the letter doesnt mention the purpose for which the road ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , also
...rpose for which the road has to be built,also lacks quantification and has troubled a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... the edges of the wetland but he or she doesnt mention the purpose for which the road ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had quantified'?
Suggestion: had quantified
...eal the sanctuarys status if the author would have quantified the decline of sea otters population. A...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'otters'' or 'otter's'?
Suggestion: otters'; otter's
...ould have quantified the decline of sea otters population. Also the author derives a a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...d the decline of sea otters population. Also the author derives a analogy between th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ers population. Also the author derives a analogy between the sanctuary in easter...
^
Line 5, column 485, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n vague terms like 'similar'. If the sanctuarys are similar only one of ...
^^
Line 5, column 583, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'weakened'.
Suggestion: weakened
...of ecology then it would have seriously weaken the authors argument. The letter sug...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 594, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...then it would have seriously weaken the authors argument. The letter suggests that t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...p protect regions biodiversity the road shouldnt be allowed to built. The author doesnt ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...houldnt be allowed to built. The author doesnt provide the current situation of tufted...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groundhogs'' or 'groundhog's'?
Suggestion: groundhogs'; groundhog's
...provide the current situation of tufted groundhogs population. If after the declaration of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 417, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... access road along the edge of the land wouldnt pose much of a threat if safety precaut...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ions are taken for the biodiversity. Thus the author of the letter fails to provi...
^^^^
Line 9, column 65, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: would've
...etter fails to provide information that wouldve allowed the editor to better understand...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.6327345309 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 2260.96107784 80% => OK
No of words: 357.0 441.139720559 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05602240896 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80355916249 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 204.123752495 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434173669468 0.468620217663 93% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 705.55239521 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5317886772 57.8364921388 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.846153846 119.503703932 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4615384615 23.324526521 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84615384615 5.70786347227 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 17.0 5.25449101796 324% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232998749635 0.218282227539 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977051435843 0.0743258471296 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832241056125 0.0701772020484 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155327157977 0.128457276422 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712263126224 0.0628817314937 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.3799401198 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.3550499002 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.197005988 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.5979740519 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 98.500998004 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.