TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task
Agnostids were arthropods-relatives of modern insects which extinct 450 million years ago. The paleontologists give some theories on what agnostids ate or how they behaved based on fossils found in rocks; however, the speaker thinks there are serious weakness with these theories and refutes each one of them.
First, the article suggests that agnostids have been swimming predators that ate smaller animals because there were some types of arthropods that lived this way. In contrast, the lecturer says that predators should have large well eye because vision is very important to detect the prey, but agnostids did not have this function. Maybe they were blind, so there should be some other sensor to do the hunting with, but there is no evidence of other sensors in fossil remains.
Second, the article writes that agnostids may have been seafloor dwellers because there are some arthropods that lived the same way; however, the professor says that seafloor dwellers are not fast and cannot swim long distances while there are signs of agnostids in multiple areas which suggests that they were fast swimmers which is unusual for a seafloor dweller animal.
Finally, the article indicates that agnostids were parasites because many species of arthropods exist as parasites, but the lecturer says that parasites live in small population because they do not want to kill the host while we know there were a large population of agnostids, so they could not live as parasites.
- TPO 41 - integrated writing 80
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 64
- TPO45 - integrated writing task 68
- Tpo 18 - question 2 70
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.Use specifi 74
Comments
Essay evaluation report
modern insects which extinct 450 million years ago.
modern insects which extincted 450 million years ago.
there are serious weakness
there are serious weaknesses
some other sensor
some other sensors
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 12
No. of Words: 240 250
No. of Characters: 1213 1200
No. of Different Words: 131 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.936 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.054 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.522 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 82 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 70 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 43 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 34.286 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.369 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.857 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.472 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.746 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.152 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, may, second, so, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1247.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19583333333 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56617622479 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554166666667 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 34.0 21.2450331126 160% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.6804913096 49.2860985944 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.142857143 110.228320801 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2857142857 21.698381199 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.522171337571 0.272083759551 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.249190726234 0.0996497079465 250% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807699008049 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312235035508 0.162205337803 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434261447245 0.0443174109184 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 13.3589403974 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 53.8541721854 69% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.0289183223 151% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.498013245 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.