Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are actually important for a country.
At the outset of this new millennium, individuals have contradicting views about the country's progress. A few people assert that only economic aspect is significant for development while remaining condemn and say that other factors are indispensable. This essay will scrutinize both virtues and will give a sophisticated solution.
On the one hand, there are a plenty of reasons why economic development is considered as a fundamental aspect. The first and foremost, it will lend a helping hand in upbringing the community. Also, better job opportunities, salary perks, a high level of employment will be made available. Not just this, elevation in an economic standard can enhance education, health as well as transport services which are key factors of the development. Apart from this, the living standard of the populace will be enriched and they can fulfill their needs also.
On the flip side, I would contend that other forms of progress are also significant in raising the level of any country which includes the elimination of evils, social justice, democracy, and more. To epitomize, the treatment with minorities can often be seen as a reflection of moral standard. Perhaps another key consideration is the environmental conditions of that particular area and observes that whether it is acquiring sustainability. Last but not least, the well-being, happiness as well as the health of the people reflects the progress. Not a single factor can contribute to it.
Mulling over the topic, Albeit economic aspect helps in upbringing the standard along with a status of citizens but other crucial factors are also not ignorable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-13 | MaKay1990 | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | Shahrear59 | 56 | view |
| 2017-02-15 | mabick_1527 | 76 | view |
| 2017-01-20 | Stephanie Kaushal | 86 | view |
| 2016-11-28 | MOKO | 89 | view |
- Appearance isn't everything. Discuss. 11
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to in 2000 and 2010. 93
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day. 78
- Freshwater has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world. Today, however, growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem. What causes of the increased demand, and what measures can governments and individuals take to respond to t 73
- In the past, sporting champions used to be motivated primarily by the desire to win a match or to break world records. These days they are more likely to be motivated by prize money and the opportunity to be famous.What message does this send to young peo 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... hand in upbringing the community. Also, better job opportunities, salary perks, ...
^^
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...riched and they can fulfill their needs also. On the flip side, I would contend t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, well, while, apart from, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29885057471 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04959663486 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613026819923 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7899234759 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7857142857 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35714285714 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0921114296191 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0289184068024 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290980517605 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0580360502947 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187186136684 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.