The number of people travelling different parts of the world to visit places increasing day by day. Some people says these people, who are travelling abroad for tourism should follow the local customs and behaviour of the host country, while others opine that host country should welcome all cultures wholeheartedly. This essay checks both sides of the argument before drawing a conclusion.
The people who have the former argument put forward some reasons to justify their stand. To begin with, some societies in the world are conservative in their beliefs and cultures. They do not like visitors disrespect their culture and rituals especially disrespect towards their religion. Blasphemy is considered as a severe offence in these parts of the world. For example, Saudi Arabia is a conservative Muslim country, which has severe punishments against blasphemy. Many travellers punished in this country in the past, who were unaware of the unique culture and religious laws this country has Thus, the travellers visiting countries like this should learn about the tradition and laws before they are travelling.
On the other hand, people who have the latter view support their argument with some genuine reasons. First and foremost, a host country should welcome all cultures around the world so that it could achieve economic growth by attracting more and more visitors to that country. Many countries all over the world taking advantage of tourism by liberal and secular laws for tourists. Dubai an Arabian country, which has most flexible rules in favour of tourists and the number of tourists to this country increasing every year is an example. Secondly, the international reputation of a tourist friendly country will be high, if they welcome different cultures. This host country national will get respect and love when they visit other countries.
To conclude, after assessing both sides, I too agree with the latter argument as it is helpful to achieve economic growth and international reputation for the host country.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wher 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 67
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 87
- Writing Task1 Cambridge10 Test1 (Pie chart) 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tional reputation for the host country.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30864197531 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61007480238 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524691358025 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.739376967 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29803878224 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089483531183 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100526245925 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184614745417 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108402883148 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.