Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Developed and safe transportation are the main key factor for country's progress. People need safe and solid transportation as well as business to produce more economic growth. In my opinion, authorities should subsidise both railroads and highways for their advantages they provide to people and societies.
Developing railways benefit societies in many aspects. First of all, trains have less effect on environment pollution. Secondly, because of the train's capacity, it can transport a huge number of people which contributes in reducing the carbon dioxide emitted with only one trip as well as avoid the traffic cognition that is caused by cars. Moreover, in terms of goods and products transportation, a train is considerable a reliable, safe and fast mode of transportation which is preferred by many firms for their business and that leads to more economic growth for societies. Thus, governments have to support and spend some money for railways for the previous benefits.
However, many individuals prefer to commute by their own cars or other public transportation on highways for many reasons. To begin with, people feel more convenient and private when using their cars. They are also available in most times. Although buses is less available comparing to the cars, they have more frequent timetable than trains which the time is the main key factor that make many employee, students and others relay on buses. So authorities should disburse some money on developing and maintenance roads and highways not only to reduce the traffic cognition, but also the casualties that are, in most cases, cause by cars.
To conclude, in my view, governments have to put fair budget on railways, highways and roads due to their benefits towards societies and dwellers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | Nayan Soni | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | kaka singh | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | Motu | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | Saahaar | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | Mampee | 73 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 11
- The charts show the Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 44
- Nowadays information is freely available on internet therefore is no longer need for museum To what extent do you agree or disagree 71
- People are not paying attention to environmental protection What is the cause and suggest solutions to deal with this issue 94
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trains'' or 'train's'?
Suggestion: trains'; train's
...ent pollution. Secondly, because of the trains capacity, it can transport a huge numbe...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun employee seems to be countable; consider using: 'many employees'.
Suggestion: many employees
...e time is the main key factor that make many employee, students and others relay on buses. So...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, as well as, first of all, in most cases, in my opinion, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28268551237 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84375689265 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56183745583 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7705572474 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.785714286 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0778036172102 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294630130831 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390214187335 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.045228147544 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230142768956 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.