Advertisements play a major role on TV in market economies. Despite the benefits of such information, many people criticize the role of TV advertising.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people advocate that television advertising has been a key factor in providing information and promoting products while the others might argue that it has a number of objectionable features to viewers. I am inclined to think that advertisements/commercials should be considered as an effective way of communicating to the messages.
Firstly, one of the reasons to support television advertising is its function of giving/providing information, which is pivotal to boost a modern economy. To put it simply, on the ground that televisions are necessary in most households these days, advertisements have more opportunities to reach numerous people than those in the past. Consequently, messages are transferred easily from people who have products and services to those wanting to purchase. For example, if some families gather around a television, watching sitcoms or TV shows, they will see/come across with commercial breaks in prime time, which helps companies launch products and raise brand awareness. Hence, advertisements have been an efficient pattern of communication by far.
Secondly, the development of advertising industry has brought about a significant source of employment. In other words, in recent years, as plenty of companies having niche products are willing to spend a huge advertising budget to reach their target consumers, various advertising agencies are established with a view to meeting their demands. Obviously, a number of jobs are created, which supports to decrease job cuts in many countries. By doing this, more people will have jobs, receive monthly salary and enjoy a better quality of life.
In conclusion, the reasons cited above have justified my stand that advertisements have brought to us not only a new workforce but also an improved living standard.
- Many developing countries require aid from international organisations to develop Many people think that this aid should be financial while others think that practical aid and advice are more useful Discuss both views and give your own opinion 86
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. Your opinion? Good or bad? 77
- Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discusss both views and give you own opinion 67
- Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations. Other think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...red as an effective way of communicating to the messages. Firstly, one of the...
^^
Line 3, column 515, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome families gather around a television, watching sitcoms or TV shows, they will ...
^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted, which supports to decrease job cuts in many countries. By doing this, more p...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y and enjoy a better quality of life. In conclusion, the reasons cited above h...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53429602888 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37391613579 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657039711191 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9598834597 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.75 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100915939561 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363964860992 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00989812404144 0.0667982634062 15% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0562985281095 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232143020992 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.