The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women form 1978 to 2008
The line graph compares the income differences between two genders in five nations during 40 - year period, from 1978 to 2008.
It is evident that the gap income between men and women of all countries decreased after 1978, except from Australia. There was a noticeable increased in the difference of salary between male and female in Australia after 1998.
In 1978, Japan was the country that has the largest gap income, at approximately 50%. The difference in income of two genders in US and UK was quite similar, at 33% and 29%, respectively. At this time, the gap income of France was only 19%. After 40 years, the percentage of income difference in all four countries declined. These figures in Japan fell to only 41% while the proportion of difference in US and UK was around 27%. France was still the country having the least difference of income, which is only 18% in 2008.
The trend in Australia was a little difference from other nations. From 20% in 1978, the percentage of gap income in France saw a slight decrease to 17% in 1998 and then rose rapidly to 25% in 2008, which was lower than that of US and UK but higher than the difference of France.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-17 | Jason Pappachan | 56 | view |
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain 56
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 91
- The two column charts show the percentage of food and other items bought by 3 European countries in 1998 and 2008 73
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? . 61
- The graph shows oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... differences between two genders in five nations during 40 - year period, from 19...
^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y 41% while the proportion of difference in US and UK was around 27%. France was ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59615384615 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51485365543 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504807692308 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8208799418 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9090909091 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27020172675 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113381169814 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669484445026 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187405984847 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349920747557 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.73 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.