TPO 36: Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage.
The professor explains arguments opposing the points stated in the reading passage about the could seeding performance in prevention of hail which has damaged many farm lands in United States.
First, the professor of the passage states that laboratory experiments indicate satisfactory results of adding silver iodide to clouds so that light snow made instead of hail. Conversely, the professor brings up some reasons to reject this hypothesis. She states using could seeding may cause drought due to its impact on prevention of precipitation, suggesting that farm lands and crops are more likely to get hurt by drought and lack of rain. As she believes, this solutions cannot solve the problem in appropriately.
Second, the professor opposes the idea presented in the reading passage about evidences from Asia. The professor sees that these evidences are not reliable due to different conditions which trigger scientists to think about cloud seeding effectiveness. As she state, this evidence are from urban and cities in Asia which are more suitable for cloud seeding because of air pollution. However, in clear and unpolluted rural areas in United States, this evidence could not be supportive due to lack of favorable conditions.
Third and last, the reading passage asserts that findings of local studies support the efficiency of cloud seeding because some scientists have found evidences that prove less crop damage in areas which cloud seeding has been used. In contrast, the lecturer disproves the idea by stating that such results were found in different places either and it seems to be results of natural phenomena not cloud seeding. Hence, she repudiates results of these studies too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-29 | PRACHI DAVE | 12 | view |
- Essay topics: TPO-29 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.Use specific reasons and examples to support your a 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan 80
- At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial supports. 76
- TPO 36: Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents or other adult relatives should make important decisions for their older (15 to 18 year-old) teenage children. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'seed'
Suggestion: seed
...this hypothesis. She states using could seeding may cause drought due to its impact on ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ught and lack of rain. As she believes, this solutions cannot solve the problem in a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33703703704 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6394729698 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9451238657 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.083333333 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0592171332063 0.272083759551 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0218832273035 0.0996497079465 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030162077912 0.0662205650399 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0454524036334 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344351238195 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.