The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four European countries between 1990 and 1999.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates a number of car thefts in Great Britain, Sweden, France, and Canada over a period of 9 years from 1990 to 1999.
It is clear that these figures had considerable variations and particularly, vehicles stolen in Great Britain were significantly higher than the others.
In 1990, the number of car thefts in Great Britain was about 17 per thousand, whereas vehicles stolen in the other countries were a much lower. Then, France and Canada experienced downward trends in the following years and the general trend of Sweden car thefts was a major increasing.
Especially, the figure of cars stolen in Sweden which had been so low surged up just under 15 per thousand. Simultaneously, vehicular thefts in Great Britain continued to increase and peaked at approximately 20 per thousand after 6 years, but then it fell to the lowest point at around 16 per thousand. Lastly, in France and Canada, the number of car thefts maintained decreasing and equalized in 1999.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-08 | Max Colorado | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | Shivani Miglani | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-01 | ann moses | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-05 | khj | 78 | view |
| 2018-02-12 | staroongirl | 73 | view |
- The chart below show 11
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is waste of resources.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007. 78
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four European countries between 1990 and 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t under 15 per thousand. Simultaneously, vehicular thefts in Great Britain contin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0243902439 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82800644695 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2372421157 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.714285714 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154607790234 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773885380264 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467235428802 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928478819075 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418847228571 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.