The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four European countries between 1990 and 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four European countries between 1990 and 1999.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given chart illustrates the information on the amount of vehicle theft occurred in four different European countries during 1990 and 1999.
Overall, it is clearly evident that the highest number of car theft cases took place in great britain while the lowest in Canada and France.
According to the diagram, In 1990 it was reported that slightly more than 15 transportations in every thousand were stolen in great britain while this rate was roughly 8 per thousand in Sweden. Abduction of cars steadily rose in great britain until 1992 and then dropped to its earlier rate after 1 year. With some fluctuations car burglary in france and Canada remained the same in a period between 1990 and 1999. Similarly, car theft incidents in great britain returned to its initial amount in 1999, despite the two sharp declines and rises over these years . Conversely, in the course of 9 years in Sweden cases of car stealing moderately grow and in 1999 it constituted 15 cars per thousand.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-08 Max Colorado 84 view
2019-07-22 Shivani Miglani 73 view
2018-08-01 ann moses 78 view
2018-07-05 khj 78 view
2018-02-12 staroongirl 73 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fluctuations'' or 'fluctuation's'?
Suggestion: fluctuations'; fluctuation's
...ts earlier rate after 1 year. With some fluctuations car burglary in france and Canada remai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...harp declines and rises over these years . Conversely, in the course of 9 years in...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, similarly, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89221556886 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58044467639 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62874251497 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.0955856772 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.714285714 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190424286121 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092583971274 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844014519344 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144680748585 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103585248449 0.0819641961636 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.