TPO 26 Integrated
The professor explains three clear arguments opposing the points stated in the reading passage about the impossibility of controlling Zebra Mussels' population in their new habitats.
First, the reading passage claims that historically, Zebra Mussells used to transport from Europe to North America by human transportation vehicles like ships which made their population invaded in Northern America's area. Conversely, the professor brings up the idea that people used to think about control-ability of Zebra Mussels due to lack of knowledge. For instance, nowadays, we can solve the ships' problem by using salt water which kills Zebra Mussels. When ships are in the ocean, they empty the ballast water and fill it with ocean's salt water. Therefore, there will not be any zebra mussel that transport to North America.
Second, the professor opposes the idea presented in the reading passage about zebra mussels' dominance in new habitat when they arrive to. He believes that zebra mussels' dominance will not sustainable for long time due to the fact that they might be prey of other predators. To illustrate, some bird in Europe found that zebra mussels are rich source of food and haunted many of them everyday. So, this reason has been repudiates by professor.
Third and last, the reading passage asserts that zebra mussels may have negative impact on fish population because they eat plankton that are food source of other fish. However, professor disproves the idea due to the fact that zebra mussels can provide nutrients which are very useful for bottom-feeding fish. As he states, although zebra mussels may cause declination in plankton eaters fish, they may cause enhancement in bottom-feeding fish population. Hence, zebra mussels can help other types of fresh water fish to survive. Thus, professor rejected this idea based on aforementioned explanations
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | Apolytos | 85 | view |
| 2020-12-26 | marathon24h | 80 | view |
| 2020-10-01 | Evelinamur | 40 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | sarah halawani | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | naziii | 80 | view |
- TPO-48 90
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Students at universities often have a choice of places to live. They may choose to live in university dormitories, or they may choose to live in apartments in the community. Compare the advantages of living in university housing with the advantages of liv 71
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. 73
- TPO 39 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ships'' or 'ship's'?
Suggestion: ships'; ship's
...or instance, nowadays, we can solve the ships problem by using salt water which kills...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...source of food and haunted many of them everyday. So, this reason has been repudiates by...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, hence, however, may, second, so, therefore, third, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3277027027 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70422043534 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547297297297 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0177249043 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.133333333 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437706837747 0.272083759551 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160635392271 0.0996497079465 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729291383813 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267735959057 0.162205337803 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674017604413 0.0443174109184 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.