TPO 26 integrated writing
In the lecture, the professor discusses three possible ways to control the spread of mussel. This contradicts the reading, which states that there are reasons to believe that the invasion of zebra mussels cannot be stopped.
First, although this invasion could not be controlled in the past because people did not have enough knowledge, but now there are effective ways to suppress this spread. For example, ship can use ocean's salty water instead of fresh water, which kill the mussels. On the other hand, the reading says that the way ships have spread the zebra mussel in the past suggests that the species will soon colonize all of the North America.
Second, the professor asserts that although mussels do not have predators when they move to new habitat, it is a matter of time until aquatic birds notice them and eat them. This challenges the reading, which claims that zebra mussels often have no predators in their new habitats, and they most likely dominate their habitats because of the lack of natural predators.
Finally, even though mussels may have negative impact on fish population that eats plankton, they may have a positive effect on other fish species because they generate nutrients, which serve as food fo other fish species.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...sts that the species will soon colonize all of the North America. Second, the profess...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, may, second, so, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 209.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04784688995 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26655924541 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617224880383 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.6083420919 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.875 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474009246297 0.272083759551 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198344396145 0.0996497079465 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929303569913 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26622132589 0.162205337803 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539963192289 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.