TPO 26 integrated writing
The reading discusses that zebra mussel is a serious threat that their invasions can not be stopped. The author listed three factors to support this idea. However, the speaker finds all the reasons dubious and presents some evidence to refute all three ideas strongly.
First, the author argues that history showed that they are unstoppable. To clarify this point, the author mentioned they stuck to the ships which were carrying cargo in the ocean and in this way spread to all world. On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this idea and states they were manageable but in the past, people did not have enough knowledge of how to control them. Besides, explained, if they emptied the freshwater and used ocean water, this salty water would kill them.
Second, the author proposes that as they did not have any predators in the new habitat they reproduced fast and became dominant. On the other hand, the speaker casts doubt on this issue by standing that in the beginning, there were not any predators while, after a period of the time, birds found a new food resource so start to feed on them.
Last but not least, the author mentioned that as they became dominant they decrease the population of the fish. Those fish fed on planktons, though they were the predator of plankton and this competition was responsible for this event. In contrast, the speaker states that although the population of fish that depend on the planktons diminished, the population of independent fish increased because zebra mussel generated nutrient materials for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | Apolytos | 85 | view |
| 2020-12-26 | marathon24h | 80 | view |
| 2020-10-01 | Evelinamur | 40 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | sarah halawani | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | naziii | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 95
- TPO 36 3
- TPO 18 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, second, so, while, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97692307692 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40842640566 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561538461538 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9274706329 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.833333333 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268527308896 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098578235273 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657756627331 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151551775096 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335495412038 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.