Some teachers are just lecturing (speaking) in class and students only take notes; some other teachers spend their class time on discussions and projects, and students share their ideas with their classmates. Which one do you prefer?
Some favor spending class time on discussions and sharing ideas with classmates, believing that it can bring advantages to students. Others, however, prefer to choose traditional teaching way, thinking that students can develop their ability by themselves. From my perspective, it is proper to have discussions in class.
First of all, students may improve their learnring effect via spending class time to share ideas with classmates. It can be guaranteed that each student is able to participate in class and truly understand knowledge. On the contrary, if students have classes in the form of tradition, it is likely that many students do not pay attention and are left behind the teaching progress. So they actually do not accept important knowledge. Besides, when students encounter problems in class, they can combine their various ideas from different perspectives to solve questions properly. While, the traditional teaching methodology only allows students to come up with their own solution simply and sometimes mistakenly. Without discussing in class, students can not treat problems more clearly and gain more knowledge.
In addition, discussions in classes can cultivate students’ flexibility of thinking and linguistic competence. When one student express his general attitude to the issue, others need to organize their thoughts and make supporting details sequential within a short time in order to respond to his comment distinctly. It is obvious that such process is able to help students boost their brain’s response speed and logical thinking. Also, sudents do not know how to convey their ideas affirmatively and leisurely in front of others. So, as students try to make statements in class, they can be gradually familiar with what words they should use or how to make others actually understand. And they ultimatelly enhance the verbal skills. However, if students only take notes when teachers impart knowledge, never would they have opportunities to promote the ability in thinking and oral expression.
By way of conclusion, I do think students should be allowed to discuss and share opinions with classmates. After all, having high quality of learning with active brain and presentation skills is more necessary for students.
Power by YOZOSOFT
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-16 | Soniasinging | 86 | view |
- A/D:It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 97
- A/D The government wants to improve the education of high schools, and there are two plans:1. Choose a group of good teachers and train them first, and after that let them go back to their schools and train other teachers.2. Provide training for every tea 76
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school.Do you think this is a good idea? 66
- Some teachers are just lecturing (speaking) in class and students only take notes; some other teachers spend their class time on discussions and projects, and students share their ideas with their classmates. Which one do you prefer? 86
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s proper to have discussions in class. First of all, students may improve their...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more clearly and gain more knowledge. In addition, discussions in classes can ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ility in thinking and oral expression. By way of conclusion, I do think student...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, first, however, if, may, so, while, after all, in addition, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44537815126 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90083849685 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574229691877 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0493902396 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.85 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431682838409 0.236089414692 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123271134602 0.076458572812 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079800756946 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263160930883 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083195778106 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.