Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether governments should fund all scientific research or only whose results are clear. Indisputably, scientific research is very important to any country to solve problems and makes progress in many fields. Nevertheless, funds should be directed to scientific research who have clear objectives. Thus, I generally disagree with the opinion that government should fund all scientific research and would argue that the government should only fund those which have clear consequences.
First of all, scientific research has to have a significant impact on the society. I would like to point out the surest way to reach that imapct by clear objectives and consequences. To illustrate further, let us look at the example of funding research to solve specific problem. In this circumstance, the objectives are clear and solving through scientific is a good way which will have great impact on the society.
Furthermore, funding means a money which is directed to specific way. So governments should gurantee that they are not wasting nation's wealth for unclear consequences. For instance, look at example of governemnt which is funding a nuclear power scientific research to generate power. They have to be sure that this funding is not directed to other purposes like producing nuclear weapons. Both common sense and personal experience had told that gthe government should follow up its funding to any field.
Admittedly, there may be scientific researchs which its all objectives are clear at the start. This is true when it comes to area of exploring something new. However, the consequences should be in constructive purposes. Like these researches have to be in the way to serve society if it is funded by the governments.
In conclusion, although all scientific researches should be funded by governments, the resrearches funded by governments should have clear consequences. The results of these researches should have a great impact on the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Vaibhav Panchal | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | sayali7 | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | 08sandip | 50 | view |
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you t 58
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 58
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing."Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued productio 16
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 53, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...there may be scientific researchs which its all objectives are clear at the start. ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 316.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34493670886 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01367357372 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48417721519 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7417083387 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.8947368421 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6315789474 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240195774453 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890222373755 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567601776321 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155406113869 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057327592774 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.