Do you agree or disagree? It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends.
From a broad perspective, in the current state of affairs we face, in which rarely do people establish contructive relationships with each other, it not far-fetched to presum that the matter of keeping the long-term friendship is of the great importance. However, thre is agrowing segment of people who contend that veracity is not work always between the companion. I personally concur with this idea, and in the ensuing paraggraph the rationale behind this statement will be further elaborated.
First and foremost, the nature of relationship has changed. Thre is no denying to the fact that nowadays, modern societies uttest the alterations in diverse aspect of life and particularly the relations between people. Indeed, the issue of privacy has been completely defined for individuals; threfore, they are not allowed to interve in each others business due to different excuses. There are so many explanations for occuring these changes and the most paramount ones is related to structure of the families. Actually, in comparison to the past, large, extended families become meaningless and its substitution is families with single child or even signle parent. Undoubtedly, people who are friends with each other in this circumstance are not accustomed to state every details of their own life. Having lived alone, people behave more conservatively. So, being honest means entrupting the privacy which is accounted as passing the red line in the friednship.
Another vital point which should be taken into consideration is thet being honest can hurt the feeling of people. Needless to say that people encounter diverse situations which put them in the dellimma. Whenever a person out to make a decision regarding the issue that her mate is not aware of it, it would be sensible if she aske whether understanding this issue renders her friend upset and vulnerable or not. It comes as no surprise that in most of the cases being cognicant of the truth not only aggravates the situation but also hinders them to give up on their relationship. Besides, sometime just restating the part of the event can smooth or solve the situation. For instance, by giving a hint and let the rest go.
To wrap it up, it is more judicious to say that freindship does not necessitate to be honest all the time. As a matter of fact, by telling the truth people enters their privacy and hurt each others feeling.
- Some people think that governments should spend as much money as possible on developing or buying computer technology. Other people disagree and think that this money should be spent on more basic needs. Which one of these opinions do you agree with? Use 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
- TPO 27 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
- Agree or disagree. Government should spend more on early education than on college education. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 334, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'work'.
Suggestion: always work
...people who contend that veracity is not work always between the companion. I personally con...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure of relationship has changed. Thre is no denying to the fact that nowadays, mo...
^^
Line 2, column 689, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...even signle parent. Undoubtedly, people who are friends with each other in this circums...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, for instance, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04785894207 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82610891714 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599496221662 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4170968671 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.473684211 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8947368421 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15789473684 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134358999981 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342295214371 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364654285947 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07909513651 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157417512544 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.