Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
From a broad perspective, in the current state of affair we face, in which new world represent new challenges for the people, it is not far-fetched to presume that modern society has imposed serious problematic issues to the people. However, whether juveniles can be accounted as those who their role is impressive or not depends on the lens through which one is looking. There is a growing segment of people who contend this idea that the future of the societies has nothing to do with the youths. I personally repudiate this idea, and in the ensuing paragraph, the rationale behind this opinion will be firther elaborated.
First and foremost, young people constitute the future of the society. There is no denying the fact that youngstars are the next generation of each community. They are individuals who will lead various flows() in the countries including thought to political and even cultural. Undoubtedly, their current mindset will demonstrare the path toward which socieaties will take steps. Take all the recent pricipal altrations occured within the later decade in different countries. The France election to protest movements in Arabian countries and even the choice of President Trump as a first man of the United States of Amrica. All of these major occurances are happened due to attitude of people who were young ten years ago. Admmittedly, it would not be seinsible if adult overlook the prominence of poistion of the juveniles who are able to change the destiny of a country.
Another vital point which sould be taken into consideration is this issue that young people make influential effect on the current() happenings in their society. Needless to say that youths come with innovate ideas. This sector of society is the enthusiastic ones who are reluctant to stability; hence, they urge to make huge difference in multitude() facets of their society. The most crucial one is technology. The demand for expereince the new world guid the young people to intorduce new phenomenon to the society. It comes as no surprise that poeple recall that advent of FACEBOOK, as a social netwrok, revotionalized the communication between people. This facility was devised by a 20 year-old student who complitely and forever made foundation changes not only in his how country but also in the lives of million of people acroos the wrold.
Tp wrap it up, it is more judicious to say that young people play the most substantial role in the society. In fact, not only are they the future of the society byt also chane the current occurances in their socaiety as well.
- Essay topics: A/D? Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 73
- TPO9 3
- TPO 7 integrated: receiving the eco-certification in wood companies of United States 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 22 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e make influential effect on the current happenings in their society. Needless to...
^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'making'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'urge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: making
...eluctant to stability; hence, they urge to make huge difference in multitude facets of ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, so, thus, well, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99069767442 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72135258102 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553488372093 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5907581376 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.19047619 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4761904762 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.19047619048 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107590812943 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03496022287 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422808380294 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0710941645767 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0100570124183 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.