When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Nowadays, there is a variety of teaching methods that helps students to experience useful education system. In this regard, project assignment is relatively innovation approach that makes the learning more practical. A plethora of people is in the conviction that work in a group brings more efficient results. Contrary to this popular belief, there are those who argue that if the students study solely they can get better consequences. I am of the opinion that, the former view has better impact on the children, and the following explanation will further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, project assignments are becoming prevalent method that lecturers use as they have specific purposes. Undoubtedly, one of the primary goals of doing this work is improving team working. We live in era of time that working in a group is an integral part of the life, regardless of age category, gender, or race. Therefore, it would be irrecoverable mistake if a teacher has deprived his student from this chance. Furthermore, the students can associate with each other in a group which is incredible issue for today's children as most of the children is single-child, and there is not many people they can communicate with them. Hence, they not only can learn new things to each other by doing the same project but also establish new relationships with each other.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that period of education period is crucial as students have learned many of essential abilities which will be helpful in the future. Admittedly, one of the initial purposes of attending to school is finding future career, and working in a group opens up this chance to build some of their important features. Working as a member in a group teaches the children how to cooperate as the smallest segment of a large organization. They get familiar with the principal of competition. Indeed, they learn the appropriate time for encouraging their teammates in order to get the best results.
On the basis of the point mentioned above, I am convinced that participation in a group to conduct the project assignment has a variety of advantages for students. In this circumstance, the children get acquainted with team working, and also prepared to enter into the society as a member.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree? People gain more happiness from their jobs than their social life. 76
- Agree or disagree. Government should spend more on early education than on college education. 73
- Some people believes that eventually all jobs will be done by artificially intelligent robots Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Do you agree or disagree? One can learn a lot about another people from the books and movies that he likes 80
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould be taken into consideration is that period of education period is crucial as...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'if', 'so', 'therefore']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.228028503563 0.229887763892 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.159144893112 0.158761421928 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0926365795724 0.0866891130778 107% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0427553444181 0.046263068375 92% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0332541567696 0.0685040099705 49% => OK
Prepositions: 0.142517814727 0.118717715034 120% => OK
Participles: 0.0451306413302 0.0351676179071 128% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.91043204728 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.021377672209 0.0309702414327 69% => OK
Particles: 0.00237529691211 0.00188951952338 126% => OK
Determiners: 0.121140142518 0.0887237588012 137% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0190023752969 0.0209618222197 91% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0190023752969 0.0139019557991 137% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2330.0 2387.08602151 98% => OK
No of words: 383.0 408.028673835 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08355091384 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.365535248042 0.338922669872 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.308093994778 0.251872472559 122% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.21409921671 0.174417080927 123% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.148825065274 0.112833075102 132% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91043204728 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543080939948 0.524397521467 104% => OK
Word variations: 60.8769456279 59.2087087015 103% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6684587814 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.2777777778 20.5533526081 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4952724159 48.84282405 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.444444444 120.699889404 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2777777778 20.5533526081 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.444444444444 0.644075263715 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 52.0871772556 45.7405998639 114% => OK
Elegance: 1.76767676768 1.45489161554 121% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162727083936 0.300154397459 54% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0933207960676 0.103427244359 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0755169887327 0.0752933317313 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.498597282245 0.497263757937 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.139263929598 0.151897553556 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700248198894 0.114077575197 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366675040777 0.0781384742642 47% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.450721778895 0.336927656856 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0404882486844 0.067059652881 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129035173979 0.210909579961 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314759713175 0.0618886996521 51% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.75985663082 217% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.