Writing task 1: The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012
The line chart compares the proportions of women members of parliament of five different countries in Europe between 2000 and 2012.
It is clear that the figures for the female members in European nations increase throughout the period shown. France witnessed the most dramatic growth in the percentage of parliament made up of women while the figures for France were the lowest over the period.
In 2000, about 33% of members of parliament in Germany being women was compared with about 25% and 27% in Belgium and Italy respectively. The countries then saw a steady rise in these figures. In particular, the percentage of women elected in parliament of Germany reached a peak of about 37% in 2012 while the figures for Belgium and Italy were lower, at about 32% and exactly 25% in turn.
There was a more sharp development in the proportions of female members in parliament of the UK and France. Although the figure for the UK was just about 27% in 2000, it then rise dramatically to under 40% at the end of the period, overtaking the figure for Germany. There was a rapid growth in the proportion of female members of parliament in France from 5% in 2000 to over 20% in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-18 | Omaii | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-27 | rzeeshan565 | 61 | view |
| 2018-09-12 | davidduong | 67 | view |
| 2017-06-11 | paras001 | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | lananhle301 | 84 | view |
- Some People Think That Strick Punishments For Driving Offences Are The Key To Reducing Traffic Accidents. Others, However, Believe That Other Measures Would Be More Effective In Improving Road Safety. Discuss Both Views And Give Your Own Opinion. 56
- Writing task 1 The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012 85
- Some People Suggest That Children Do Not Understand The World Of Work And Schools Should Make All Teenagers Spend A Short Time Working As Well As Studying Academic Subjects To What Extent Do You Agree 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... women while the figures for France were the lowest over the period. In 2000, ab...
^^
Line 4, column 175, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rises'?
Suggestion: rises
... UK was just about 27% in 2000, it then rise dramatically to under 40% at the end of...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6875 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60120146768 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466346153846 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5322083905 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275240453599 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131712147283 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880206010558 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18336293719 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608945295178 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.