The topic is about whether or not working in a group is more effective and efficient than working individually. The lecture holds the perspective that working in a group have negative impact on the project, which is on the opposite side of the reading passage.
First, the lecture uses an example to make the argument that people working in the group tend to take a free ride over others' contribution. However, the recognition goes to the whole group instead of to the real contributors. Those hard-working members will feel opposite to what is stated in the reading passage that variety skills will be possess.
Secondly, the lecture suggests that group working doesn't move as quickly as the way it is showed in the reading passage. The group will spend a lot of time reaching the consensus. Also, some people with great influence are prone to dominate the decision-making process by disagreeing ideas or convincing others. In this case, those people with great ideas will be ignored.
Thirdly, the lecture reputes the statement in the reading passage saying that members will have more opportunity to "shine". In the lecture, rewards go to the group as a whole, not individually. However, if something goes wrong, the blame is placed on all the members.
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 86
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 74
- TPO-07 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- Do you agree or disagree: to be successful in business, companies must put more money in advertising. 41
Essay evaluation report
working in a group have negative impact on the project
working in a group has a negative impact on the project
working in a group has negative impacts on the project
variety skills will be possess.
variety skills will possess.
Sentence: However, the recognition goes to the whole group instead of to the real contributors.
Description: The token of is not usually followed by a preposition
Suggestion: Refer to of and to
flaws:
No. of Words: 212 250 //You got all ideas. but try to put a little bit more summary from reading.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 12
No. of Words: 212 250
No. of Characters: 1017 1200
No. of Different Words: 114 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.816 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.797 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.614 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 71 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 60 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 25 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 17 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.989 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.381 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.605 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.096 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The topic is about whether or not working in a group is more effective an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...the group tend to take a free ride over others contribution. However, the recognition ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...the lecture suggests that group working doesnt move as quickly as the way it is showed...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 211.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04265402844 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87245238121 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545023696682 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.694176647 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5833333333 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294723975057 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103451799466 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040723826198 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178023112515 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403942037842 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.