The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UKSummarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

the graph indicates the variation of the private use of Internet, PC, mobile phones and CD player in the UK from 1996 to 2003
The trend in four elements of the study was upward except in mobile phone that was rather erratic. CD player had the biggest figure among all with 60% at 1996/97 and 80% at 2002/03. While the Internet access only started in 1998/99 showing the lowest figure throughout the period (from 10% in 1998/99 to above 40% in 2002/03)
Between 1996/97 and 1998/99mobile phone and PC were going upward while just after 1999 the former exceeded, showing figure of 70% compared to home computers with 55% in 2002/03
To sum up, it was expected to have home computers as
exceeding figure in the study as they provide features of the CD player and the Internet access but CD player and mobile phone were the two top modern technology access in homes

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-05 mary.ssherr 56 view
2022-03-27 jalilovmahmudbek@gmail.com 100 view
2019-08-07 mary.ssherr 78 view
2022-08-10 mary.ssherr view
2022-08-10 mary.ssherr view
Essays by user Thu Ngo :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the graph indicates the variation of the pr...
^^^
Line 4, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t was expected to have home computers as exceeding figure in the study as they pr...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 712.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62337662338 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26164272804 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564935064935 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 198.9 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 51.0 22.4926829268 227% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 197.167159763 43.030603864 458% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 237.333333333 112.824112599 210% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 51.3333333333 22.9334400587 224% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0929877387186 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047384462392 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540412715142 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0574114168359 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433973290204 0.0819641961636 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.0 13.2329268293 196% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.6 10.3012195122 190% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 22.4 10.9970731707 204% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 26.0 11.0658536585 235% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.