The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant.
The first bar chart illustrates the main reasons for study of students from many age groups. The second bar chart gives information about employer support that they received. Both diagrams are divided into five age groups. They are under 26, 26-29, 30-39, 40-49 and over 49.
Overall, the first bar chart shows the rise of people who study for interest when they get older. In constrast, when becoming older, people studying for career reduce. The second bar chart describes that employer support goes down through age groups until people are 39 years old before increasing again when they reach 40 and over.
With the age under 26, 80% persons studies for career whereas it is only 10% for interest. In contrast, the rate of over 49 year olds studying for career is approx 10% while 70% of over 49 year olds studies for interest. This rate is only stable when people are between 40 and 49 years old. 40% of them studies because of career and the same rate for interst.
Over 60% support people receive from their employer for study when they are under 26. The support from employer is lowest when they are at age group 30-39. Employer support is predicted to increase slightly when people become 40 and over.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | noor salah | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | Simranjot | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-17 | Minh Pham | 67 | view |
| 2018-09-08 | PS4pro | 73 | view |
| 2017-07-27 | Anh_nguyen | 73 | view |
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 25
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Leaders and directors in organizations are often older people. Some peple say that younger people could be leaders. Do you agree or disagree ? 67
- The older people who need employment have to compete with younger ones What problems can this create What are some solutions 81
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1007.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.05016192954 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514150943396 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3700006601 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.9285714286 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1428571429 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232101892332 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101561761506 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767640701212 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161691653867 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509159508685 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.