The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996.
The pie charts show changes in American spending patterns between 1966 and 1996.
Food and cars made up the two biggest items of expenditure in both years. Together they comprised over half of household spending. Food accounted for 44% of spending in 1966, but this dropped by two thirds to 14% in 1996. However, the outlay on cars doubled, rising from 23% in 1966 to 45% in 1996.
Other areas changed significantly. Spending on eating out doubled, climbing from 7% to 14%. The proportion of salary spent on computers increased dramatically, up from 1% in 1996 to 10% in 1996. However, as computer expenditure rose, the percentage of outlay on books plunged from 6% to 1%.
Some areas remained relatively unchanged. Americans spent approximately the same amount of salary on petrol and furniture in both years.
In conclusion, increased amounts spent on cars, computers, and eating out were made up for by drops in expenditure on food and books.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-22 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
- The Bar graph bellow shows the Expenditure in Million Pounds on fast food items by income groups in the UK. 73
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 53
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 92
- The table below shows the hours of leisure time spent by people in different age groups in Someland Link https www ielts exam net academic writing samples task 1 104 This is an IELTS Task 1 please help me correct it 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, third, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0251572327 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80060004759 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7597334317 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.5833333333 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.25 22.9334400587 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230489878638 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875740393899 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161519751533 0.0843802449381 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162618585389 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.219337181665 0.0819641961636 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.