Some animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea. What are the reason? What solution to solve them?
There is a growing concern that the extinction of animal species are more popular because of the impact of human on land and in the sea. Although there will undoubtedly be some negative consequences of this trend, societies can take steps to mitigate these serious problems.
To begin with, the phenomenon can be attributable to two principal factors. One of the most serious reasons which threaten animal’s life is the natural forest is destroyed to build factories and houses. To be more specific, cutting trees in forest is essential to have more places for building to meet the demand of social development. Therefore, some animal species could be lost their houses and they can be caught easier which leads to the higher extinct dange. Another worrying trend is the pollution of sea environment due to the development of tourism in recent years. As a matter of fact, visitors who could litter into the sea and oil released from boats carrying them are two main reasons of the extinction of marine animals.
It is not impossible to tackle such problem as there are promising solutions that people can make use of. The first measure which should be taken in order to deal with harmful human activities is that government must have strict punishment for deforesting. On the other hand, if they have to construct a project in forest, above-ground animal species living in that environment need to be moved to the zoo to be protected. Secondly, one way to solve this problem is the raise of individual’s awareness. For example, people should be taught about how to protect sea environment and endanger species living there when they were children. As a result, they can understand about the importance o animal species and have a better awareness to preserve the natural environment.
In conclusion, although human activities could affect animal’s life not only on land but also submarine environment when causing various adverse results, some appropriate steps need to be taken to resolve these issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Thang Tran | 95 | view |
| 2017-12-06 | sherin rijo | 89 | view |
| 2021-06-21 | minhngoc_8 | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | akananepa | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-16 | hthngn | 73 | view |
- Scientists agree that people are damaging their health by eating too much junk food Some people think that the answer to this problem is to educate people Others think education will not work Discuss both views and state your opinion 95
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries What are the reasons for this Who benefits more from this the communities or these young 79
- Big companies sponsor sport events to advertise them selves. More organisers believe that it is beneficial to the world of sports. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea. What are the reason? What solution to solve them? 73
- The bar chart shows active participation rates in top ten sports in Canada in 1998 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ossible to tackle such problem as there are promising solutions that people can make use of. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0960960961 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82897228075 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.932874915 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.133333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229250279872 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741714143404 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620966404269 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144763816019 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259512818802 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.