Some people think that good health is very important to every person, so medical service should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the advantages of private healthcare outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that medical service should not be operated by profit-oriented private companies. While I accept that there are some drawbacks, I think that these are outweighed by the benefits of this trend.
On the one hand, there are some drawbacks of operating in private healthcare services. Firstly, the cost of treatment in private healthcare is likely to be higher than in ones subsidized by the government. For example, patients who live in remote and rural areas are not able to afford prescription charges in state hospitals because of the availability of latest machine and professional doctors. Therefore, this leads to further the gap between the rich and the poor. Secondly, it will be difficult to control treatment process in private hospitals. For example, a large number of unnecessary tests performed to raise the cost of treatment and earning for unethical doctors.
On the other hand, it seems to me that patients should choose private healthcare institutions to operate individual health because of some undeniable advantages. Firstly, the growth of private healthcare centers lessens the burden of state-owned healthcare institutions in taking care of the public's health. For instance, in terms of the overload of patients and finance, the rapidly rising of state hospitals reduce the pressure on state-owned health institutions. Secondly, it's obvious advantages is state healthcare services make a great contribution to limit the rise in the crime rate. For instance, most specialist clinics offering treatment and advice are required to help people who are addicted to drugs.
In conclusion, I believe the there are many advantages for people who operate in private healthcare institutions, although this decision has some disadvantages.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-11-23 | Rapunzel | 56 | view |
2017-08-22 | sonchip96hb | 61 | view |
2017-08-12 | Van Luong Ngoc Thuy | 67 | view |
2017-07-28 | hanacha | 67 | view |
2017-07-16 | minhanh1810 | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school. Discuss both views. 67
- Modern technology now allows rapid and uncontrolled access to and exchange of information Far from being beneficial this is a danger to our societies To what extent do you agree or disagree 66
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...e hospitals because of the availability of latest machine and professional doctors. There...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...cess in private hospitals. For example, a large number of unnecessary tests performed to raise th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...care institutions in taking care of the publics health. For instance, in terms of the o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4598540146 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04840449958 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536496350365 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.852018901 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.857142857 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255005555505 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926408765703 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795746107964 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176599620432 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763053239158 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.