The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table show percentages of consumer expenditure for three categories of products and services in five countries in 2002.
It can be seen that the majority of spending in each country went on food, drinks and tobacco. On the other hand, leisure/ education category received the least payment from consumers.
Turkey and Ireland held noticeably higher rate of consumption on food, drink and tobacco compared to other countries, at 32.14% and nearly 29% respectively. Additionally, with regard to didactic and recreational investment, Turkey was also the highest among 5 countries, at just over 4%. Standing at 9% in fashion-related equipment expenditure, it was Italy which percentage of consumption in this category was significant higher than other countries.
It can also be seen that Sweden had the least percentages of national consumer spending for food/drinks/tobacco (15.77%) and for clothing/footwear (5.40%). The figures for Spain in these 2 categories was slightly higher, however, proportion of spending for the last category was significantly lower than others, with just over 2%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Noah1997 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | shayma | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | phungnguyen1611 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
- In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 78
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 78
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 65
- People in community now could buy cheaper consumer goods. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59880239521 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33347436564 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622754491018 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5127091267 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.875 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0941176543626 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505609653449 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745367560527 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086867200619 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859381489549 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.