tpo integrated 30
There has been some debates among the burning mirror about whether the Greek build just device or not. The lecture believe that the Greek build the burning mirror. However, the reading disagrees and think that there was no need for the Greek to build that device.
The first point of the disagreement is about the ancient Greek were not technologically advanced enough to build that device. The lecture point out the Greek used a small pieces of copper and assemble them together to form the burning mirror device. Moreover, the Greek knew how to directed the small collected pieces of mirror into a parabolic shape. Whereas the author opposes this point by explaining that the technology for manufacturing a large sheet of copper did not exist in the ancient world.
The second area of dispute is that the it took long time from the burning mirror device to set a fire on a ship. The lecturer says that there was a materials called pitch used to seal the space in the boat, this material is flammable and start to fire in a second. When the pitch fire the wood of the ship begin to fire also. On the other hand, the author refutes this by saying that such device is impractical and ineffective, as it took ten minutes to set the object on a fire, and through that time ship has to stay perfectly.
The final issue of the argument is that the burning fire did not seem to be an improvement on a weapon for the Greek. The lecture claims that the Roman were already familiar with flaming arrow, which is a device working in the same way like the burning mirror. However, the burning mirror look different and new to the Roman. Using the burning mirror would be surprising and effective to the Roman. However, the author refutes that by stating that Greek had no reasons to build a weapon like a burning weapon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | Salu | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-08 | maya14 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lucasantunes | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | fateme ozggoli | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | ilda | 85 | view |
- TPO INTEGRATED 22 60
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 70
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 60
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 70
- using printed materiles or internet. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e debates among the burning mirror about whether the Greek build just device or n...
^^
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ek build just device or not. The lecture believe that the Greek build the burning...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d for the Greek to build that device. The first point of the disagreement is a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...semble them together to form the burning mirror device. Moreover, the Greek knew ...
^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... mirror device. Moreover, the Greek knew how to directed the small collected piec...
^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f mirror into a parabolic shape. Whereas the author opposes this point by explain...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r did not exist in the ancient world. The second area of dispute is that the i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 36, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
... The second area of dispute is that the it took long time from the burning mirror ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 147, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a material' or simply 'materials'?
Suggestion: a material; materials
... ship. The lecturer says that there was a materials called pitch used to seal the space in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 266, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lammable and start to fire in a second. When the pitch fire the wood of the ship beg...
^^^^
Line 9, column 321, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...fire the wood of the ship begin to fire also. On the other hand, the author refutes ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., the author refutes this by saying that such device is impractical and ineffecti...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that time ship has to stay perfectly. The final issue of the argument is that ...
^^^^^^
Line 12, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n improvement on a weapon for the Greek. The lecture claims that the Roman were a...
^^
Line 12, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the same way like the burning mirror. However, the burning mirror look differe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, whereas, as to, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 334.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59880239521 5.08290768461 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3517463794 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473053892216 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.1864191398 49.2860985944 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.714285714 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 4.19205298013 358% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.541067352993 0.272083759551 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190494588301 0.0996497079465 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089677243557 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307738038892 0.162205337803 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862280938734 0.0443174109184 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.