TPO28
The reading specifies that there are three arguments shows the Peary's claim reached the north. However, the professor explain that this argument are not convincing and refutes each of author's reasons.
First of all, the committee that National Geographic put together conclude that Peary's accounts are consistent and persuasive . Nevertheless, author say that the committee examine Peary's records and equipment in 2 days and they have to assign much more time for exam it. Therefore, they need to exam the records carefully and the result they achieve is not trustworthy.
Second, based on the reading, a recent expedition provide support for the claim that Peary's reached the North pole in 37 days . In contrast, Tom Avery situation in travel to north was different. he did not take food himself and in the way airplane drop food for him. Also, when Peary's travel north the weather condition was unfavor but during Tom's travel weather was favor and this make different in their situation.
Third, according to reading, Peary take photographs that support his claim to have reached the North Pole . On the contrary, the lecturer states that photographs do no prove anything and for calculate the Sun's position we need a technic. For this calculate we need the shadow to locate the precise position of the Sun and quality of photo was too bad and fuzzy to determine shadow. Also, after a while the shadow in picture become fade and with this situation we can not locate sun accurate.
Therefore, the specific points mentioned in the reading to not make sense.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-25 | Hamide | 70 | view |
| 2020-02-08 | zizi.dream | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | crystal80314 | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | DAISY CHANG | 71 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | ememari | 75 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng and refutes each of authors reasons. First of all, the committee that Nationa...
^^^
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s accounts are consistent and persuasive . Nevertheless, author say that the commi...
^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...Pearys reached the North pole in 37 days . In contrast, Tom Avery situation in tra...
^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ation in travel to north was different. he did not take food himself and in the wa...
^^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...his claim to have reached the North Pole . On the contrary, the lecturer states th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, while, as to, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51004718205 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.404718966 49.2860985944 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.8571428571 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441051787437 0.272083759551 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146831306822 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147691750993 0.0662205650399 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194750928904 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112309771566 0.0443174109184 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.