tpo-44
In the reading, the author claims that a European silver coin found in 1957 in the state of Main is not a genuine historical evidence and it did not bring to North America by Norse actually it was recently placed at the site by someone. The author supports the claim by pointing out 3 reasons of support. However, finding all reasons questionable and implausibe, the lecturer totally repudiates it and presents some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that there is a great distance, more than a thousand kilometers, between the site in Maine where the coin was excavated and the Norse settlements. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea this far distance does not refute the gunuinety of the coin. Owing to the fact that there are many other objects found in Maine which were originally belonged to far distance regions. Native American could reach North America and gain the silver coins from the Norse and then bring back to the Manie.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that the fact that there is no other coins found at the Canadian sites corroborate the idea that the Norse did not bring any silver coins to America. That being said, the lecturer disputes the idea by clarifying the fact that European packed all the objects which they brought with them to North America and moved them back to Europe when they returned home.
Finally, the author draws attention to the fact that although silver coins may have been used in Europe, they were actually useless in North America. If European could not use the coins in America, why they would have brought them America?. Yet again, the lecturer dismisses it by pointing out that silver coins may have other functions other than money. These coins were very appealing and their beauty could be useful for European in North America. For example, they could use them in neckless or other pieces of jewelry or also use them in trades.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-29 | Nurmira | 71 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | donyamalekA | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | Amin1990 | 81 | view |
| 2019-05-12 | jessicaguo78 | 83 | view |
| 2019-03-11 | alirezad | 65 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, conversely, finally, first, however, if, may, so, then, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78378378378 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29225732256 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483483483483 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2506212289 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.785714286 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.537842612804 0.272083759551 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192030942361 0.0996497079465 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119383114023 0.0662205650399 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328290957122 0.162205337803 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617343896971 0.0443174109184 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.