Do you aGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT?
Internet should be like other services such as roads and government should provide it to the public with no cost.
By and large, it is of little debate in today's world that Internet is of great importance. This is inasmuch as nowadays people use internet in almost every aspect of their life. With this in mind, it is quite expected to notice some of its considerations are somewhat controversial due to its prominent standing; many people wonder what is the best way for governments to provide internet for the public. One idea of prominence in this regard is that governments should provide the internet for free. I repudiate it personally. Among the many reasons one can give for this opinion, I will provide two reasons to vindicate my standpoint.
First and foremost, The infrastructure of the internet is costly to build and maintain. Internet services need some basic elements. Some good examples of which are the antennas, the cables and the monitoring companies to name but a few. The costs of these infrastructures should be provided from a source, It is not logical to pay these expenses from tax money because not all the people are using the internet on the same scale. For instance let's take a retired teacher, who lives with his wife, and assume that he is paying for internet services by tax money while rarely does he use the internet. It goes without saying that having him paid for the internet is not fair. Therefore people paying for internet service based on their usage is a better idea.
Another point worth mentioning is that government can use the money to improve the providing services. Developing a service is also costly so for the government to improve the service a budget should be dedicated. For example in my country, Iran, the government recently changed the antennas to provide a 4G service for mobile network. It goes without saying that this change required a great amount of money. And by charging people for the service the government could cover the money and continue the improvement of infrastructure.
In conclusion, having analyzed the reasons above, one can safely conclude that people, who use internet services, should pay for it. This is due to the reasons given, which are the cost of infrastructures and their maintenance, and the idea of developing the services using the money people have paid for the services. Thus let's hope that governments charge people with rational expenses for internet services and use the money for developing and promoting them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-01 | meliiw_amd | 90 | view |
| 2021-08-30 | hazrat | 88 | view |
| 2021-01-07 | Negintavakkoli | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-12 | Pooja dave | 70 | view |
| 2020-07-11 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 675, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... him paid for the internet is not fair. Therefore people paying for internet service base...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'reasons'' or 'reason's'?
Suggestion: reasons'; reason's
..., should pay for it. This is due to the reasons given, which are the cost of infrastruc...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9504950495 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7365627364 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467821782178 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7183250833 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2380952381 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2380952381 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213432251695 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750630461045 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570146171724 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150668337584 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176980694437 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.