Without a shadow of a doubt, The Internet and social media have become pivotal parts of our life and have dramatically influenced our lifestyles. An unanswered question in this area is whether everyone should access the free Internet as same as public roads. Despite arguments asserting that offering the Internet with no charge puts the current infrastructure under colossal pressure and reduces the Internet access quality, I believe otherwise, maintaining that the disadvantages of this decision are infinitesimal compared to the advantages offering. In the following essay, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two compelling reasons.
The first exquisite point corroborating my stance on this subject is that spend budgets on providing free access to the Internet is a promising step toward an educated society. These days, many websites like YouTube have been designed that equip individuals with invaluable information and skills. As a result, knowledge acquisition is neither excluded for only a few parts of the community nor as time-consuming as it was in the past. Furthermore, many schools and universities hold online classes and exams, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic period. Therefore, if a government does not allot suitable funds for the free Internet, it will deprive many poor children of their fundamental rights and seeds the plants of widespread illiteracy. A survey conducted in my country has revealed that 30 percent of students could not continue their education due to exorbitant expenses of Internet access.
Another reason to be mentioned is that accessing the Internet without any payments assists the flourishing of the country’s economy. Thanks to the development of Internet-based technologies, every people can make a fortune easily by running their own online business such as electronic commerce or acquiring lucrative digital skills like social marketing. In other words, even people who live in remote areas that access the Internet or people with physical disabilities can make money without any commuting. Accordingly, one of the conducive government policies to eliminate poverty and guarantee society’s well-being is promoting the further advance of online business. The prerequisite for this aim is governments implement the same strategies that each administration has done throughout history to expand trades by funding free and secure network transportation routes.
Reflecting upon all grounds mentioned above, one soon realizes that governments should remove impediments of Internet access for everyone and not begrudge any penny spent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ryone and not begrudge any penny spent.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2216.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65306122449 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0704410576 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.524837075471 121% => OK
syllable_count: 705.6 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0206661241 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187456971556 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524816032114 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037623299385 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107992167786 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200485465616 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 11.7677419355 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 58.1214874552 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 10.9000537634 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.01818996416 127% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.