Both reading and lecture take about using ethanol fuel instead of gasoline. The reading mentions the disadvantages of this process. While in contrary, the lecture stats the supporting reasons for using ethanol as fuel.
First, about global warming, the reading says that ethanol will cause a lot of environmental problems like global warming. Simply because ethanol releases carbon dioxide, which traps heat in the atmosphere. On the other hand, the lecture disagrees. It stats that ethanol made from plants. Plants counteract the process of releasing carbon dioxide, as they absorb it from the air in the growing process. As a result, ethanol will not cause global warming.
Second, the reading says that using ethanol as a fuel will decrease the number of plants available as animals food source. As it is mentioned, if the amount of ethanol used to satisfy only ten percent of the fuel use, more than sixty percent of corn will be diminished. Yet, the professor has another opinion. He says that ethanol can be gotten from cellulose, which is a part of the plant's cell wall. This part is not eaten by animals. This means that producing ethanol from cellulose, will not decrease the amount of animals food.
Third, the reading says that ethanol fuel will never compete with gasoline in price. Now they both about the same price because of the tax subsidies, the USA government give to ethanol producers. If the government decide to stop the subsidies, the price will increase. On the other hand, the lecture doesn't agree. It states that in the future ethanol producers will not need the subsidies. As the ethanol customer will increase, the production will increase as well, leading to a good decrease in the price.
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 73
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 71
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 66
- TPO-34 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.U 70
- face to face communication versus other types of communication 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'plants'' or 'plant's'?
Suggestion: plants'; plant's
... from cellulose, which is a part of the plants cell wall. This part is not eaten by an...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 301, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ncrease. On the other hand, the lecture doesnt agree. It states that in the future eth...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... As the ethanol customer will increase, the production will increase as well, le...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third, well, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97569444444 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45403097704 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486111111111 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 1.25165562914 559% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0626512541 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.2380952381 110.228320801 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7142857143 21.698381199 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47619047619 7.06452816374 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461893303654 0.272083759551 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143639386254 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968112721552 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284647891023 0.162205337803 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360894080204 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.