Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that teachers play a significant role in every given society and they educate vast majorities of children who are well adjusted and suppose to attend the society in near future. Stemming from this fact, a relevant question that is a moot point is whether educators were more valued by the public in the past. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general argument on this issue. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that teachers have always been the most appreciable character and the role they play were important since the dawn of civilization. The following paragraphs will aptly substantiate my personal stance.
To commence with, we all know that a society needs to make a progress and by nature, the nation needs to be progressive because more progressiveness brings success. Indeed, teachers can provide an opportunity for a society to come into being because they are knowledgeable and are an integral part of every given society. Generally phrased, it is incumbent upon the government to patronize and support teachers greatly because they help a country to flourish and thrive by education a plethora of children. Whether in the past or now they have a critical role to play and we cannot neglect them. As a vivid example, the future of a country, children and their destiny all are in the hands of teachers and it depends on their ability how to prepare them to live in the bustling city. In fact, not only can they educate children and prepare them for having a successful personal life but also can provide fertile ground for a society to make a progress day in day out and reach a conspicuous success. To elucidate more on this issue, not until teachers appreciate in the whole stage can we gain a success in a different realm.
Another reason that should not go unnoticed is that in the past people were more curious and were more likely to gain a well-paid and a decent job. So, they tried hard and made an effort to enhance their education dramatically in order to achieve their goal. If we take a minute to ponder over it, in this case, individuals respect their teachers owing to the fact that the only way to attain their goals is their teachers. But nowadays, humans are more willing to choose jobs with less level of complication and they do not care about their study so, they do not appreciate the role of a teacher.
However, this is the side effect of a coin. In today's hectic city of life, the competition for getting a decent job increase among students and they study hard and bend over backward to seize the opportunity. So, they will certainly know the value and the important role of their teacher better than students in the past.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that teachers have always had a critical task to do and people from past till now know their important role that they play.
- A person you know is planning to move to your town or city. What do you think this person would like and dislike about living in your town or city? 70
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you 66
- Some movies are serious. Other movies are designed to entertain. Which do you prefer? 73
- technology has made children less creative than children in the past Do you agree or disagree 64
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare Has this change improved the way people live 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, in fact, by and large, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2419.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69708737864 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60515234464 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48932038835 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 772.2 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.2586208182 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.95 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251431879527 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764751513834 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616009170134 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141841547601 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391915455419 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.