The tables below give information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000, with an estimate of the situation in 2050. Summarise the information.
The table compares about the proportion of people and their distributions among six different regions in the globe in 1950 and 2000, with anticipated totals for 2050.
Overall, it can be seen that while the population of people in Asia and Africa is set to grow, Europe and North America will witness a drop in the population. A striking feature is that Oceania is likely to remain stable throughout the term in the question.
Asia stood at 56% in 1950, which was the highest percentage of all given distributions, and the figure is set to experience a gradual swell to 59% in 2050. On the other hand, there was a sharp slid to 12% in 2000, approximately two times much less than 22% in 1950. Ultimately, the percentage is predicted to hit a trough of 5% in 2050. Latin America had 6% of the world population; this figure rose to 9% in 2000, a slight growth and is forecasted to stay uniform in 2050.
The population was only 7% and 5% in 1950 and 2000 correspondingly for North America and is going to shrink marginally to 4% over the following fifty years. Nonetheless, Africa will have nearly doubled by 2050 from 9% to 20%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-17 | Candice987 | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-17 | Rajan wahla | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-21 | Harpreet singh tung | 76 | view |
| 2022-05-07 | Jenil | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-08 | ThaoLyBui | 73 | view |
- The bar chart shows the number of overseas students enrolled in a third year Computer Science course at a Canadian college.Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The graph shows Internet Usage in Taiwan by Age Group 1998 2000 80
- The tables and pie chart show in percentage terms of the results of a survey of a new shopping complex in Auckland New Zealand 79
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant 79
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 76
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
for which region?
On the other hand, there was a sharp slid to 12% in 2000, approximately two times much less than 22% in 1950. Ultimately, the percentage is predicted to hit a trough of 5% in 2050.
be careful to double check after essay writing.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 204 200
No. of Characters: 889 1000
No. of Different Words: 118 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.779 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.358 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.73 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 52 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 36 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 24 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.6 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.392 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.661 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.045 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nonetheless, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57352941176 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75196532478 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602941176471 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5178799433 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218242878004 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781207327757 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663431397282 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127470920626 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785345257537 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.