Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not.
In this day and age, there is an ongoing debate among people about dangerous sports. While there are conclusively valid arguments to claim that these kinds of sports help people to become more self-confident, I am highly inclined to believe that those who are exposed to stressful situations may suffer from mental problems. Providing solid academic evidence, I will discuss both sides of the argument and draw a rational conclusion.
To begin, advocates consider the adventurous sports as a chance to get away from the monotony of everyday life as well as making economic profits, since these sports including scuba diving, bungee jumping, etc. have become lucrative sports during the last decades. According to a study undertaken at Tehran University, although strenuous exercise can improve the chances of serious injuries, facing up the challenges reduce the depression rate among athletes. Thus, there is tangible evidence that taking risky sports is more beneficial.
Furthermore, it should be mentioned that risk-taking sports are life-threatening and the sportsman may sustain permanent injuries. Take a victim as an example. Living with disabilities can reduce confidence while breeding some difficulties in life. Moreover, these sports are costly, and not all people can afford it. Regarding the results of an experiment conducted by Melbourne University, it was revealed that despite universal interest in exciting experiences, not only does the workout cost too much, but it also disturbs body which could be irremediable. Hence, scientific research strongly refutes the hypothesis that dangerous activities are intertwined with positive mental features.
In a nutshell, although there are several compelling arguments on both sides, my sentiment is that the flaws of these kinds of sports outweigh its privileges substantially. I think the authorities should take immediate measures to break the cycle of getting involved in harmful activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-30 | Mpaul | 70 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | Simranjot7087 | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | mizomz123 | 55 | view |
| 2019-04-27 | rayudurp | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-21 | jaideep singh | 88 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? (Give your reasons.) 77
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? (Give your reasons.) 77
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, while, i think, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62962962963 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97363779539 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673400673401 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4346153721 50.4703680194 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.466666667 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.039817882374 0.242375264174 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.012381866797 0.0925447433944 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0258659398039 0.071462118173 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0209350721668 0.151781067708 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132115282833 0.0609392437508 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.