The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The bar graph compares about how many law breakers were incarcerated in five nations from 1930 to 1980.
Overall, it can be seen that while there was an increasing trend in Great Britain throughout the period, the rest witnessed some fluctuations.
In terms of the USA, it was joint second with New Zealand at 100000 in 1930. However, there was a sharp swell in 1940 to around 13000, but the next 30 years (1940 to 1970) experienced a moderate variation. Having had an inconsistency (the USA), the number of prisoners then hit a peak of roughly 139000, which was the highest total of all countrie...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-12 | phuongnguyen1234 | 67 | view |
| 2022-05-29 | Dhvani Bhanushali | 62 | view |
| 2022-05-29 | Dhvani Bhanushali | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-11 | lapkhanh | view | |
| 2021-11-24 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 73
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 82
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- Some people think it is more important to plant more tree in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 82
- The chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 59
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 183 200
No. of Characters: 850 1000
No. of Different Words: 125 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.678 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.645 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.554 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 55 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 36 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 23 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 16 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.464 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.364 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.656 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.016 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, second, so, then, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82513661202 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63376640801 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688524590164 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7836875253 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1111111111 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0766190649465 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337155314378 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033580483388 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0501371858286 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401861371989 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.