The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of British people donating money to charity by five different age groups for the years 1990 and 2010.
Overall, while the first three age groups (18-25, 26-35, 36-50) handed out a significant amount of money in 1990, the other two groups provided much money in the latter year 2010. Another interesting feature is that 18-25 age groups contributed trivial as opposed to the remaining groups in the given period in the question.
In 1990, 26-35 and 36-50 age groups donated about one-third (32%) and two-fifths (42%) of the total, compared to 24% and 35% in 2010 respectively. Nearly 18% was laid on by 18-25 groups in 1990, whereas the figure shrunk to around 6% in 2010, three times lower than the former year.
In contrast, 51-65 and >65 age groups exhibited opposite trends. The percent for 2010 was slightly higher than 1990 as 35% vs 39% for 51-65 and 33% vs 35% for >65 age groups. 51-65 groups constituted the highest proportion for the year 2010 at just under 40%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-09 | nicktyranov | 61 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | Johan | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-07 | Tracyphi | 56 | view |
| 2018-01-10 | milanree1527@yahoo.com | 66 | view |
| 2018-01-09 | milanree1527@yahoo.com | 51 | view |
- TOPIC: In many countries, woman no longer feel the need to get married. Some people believe that this is because woman are able to earn their own income and therefore do not require the financial security that marriage can bring. To what extent do you agr 56
- The table below gives information about student enrolment at Bristol University in 1928 1958 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 50
- now a day many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. in what ways has technology affected personal relationship? has this become a positive or negative? 90
- The graph shows Internet Usage in Taiwan by Age Group 1998 2000 80
- The table below gives the information about rail transport in four countries in 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 74
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
better summary:
The donation in 1990 is greater than that in 2010, however the patterns of giving money are different before and after the age 50.
and:
The donation rate of the 18-25 age group was always surpassed by other groups, while middle-age groups (aged 36-65) had the highest donation rates.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 176 200
No. of Characters: 799 1000
No. of Different Words: 99 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.642 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.54 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.376 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 53 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 31 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 20 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 13 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.325 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.375 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.492 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.756 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.157 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, third, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77840909091 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36237264076 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2780450872 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.125 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188062875563 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997416753936 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772104558236 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147443881564 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083439601473 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.