As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Nowadays, technology is ubiquitous. Throughout a normal day, we unconsciously use these devices to accomplish our tasks, for instance commuting thanks to the engine of a car, or browsing the Web with a smartphone and the suitable network. Hence the doubt casted about our independence towards technology and the questions whether our thinking is affected by such supposed dependance.
First, common sense would think that more and more people today rely recklessly on technology, particularly on smartphones and other high-technology devices. Indeed, take the public transportations to count how many people are using their phones, whether it is for listening to music, read articles on websites or even skimming passively through their social media feed. It is no need to recall all the negative effects such an excessive could have on our health, both physical - tired eyes, deafened ears - and mental - stress, fear of missing out. Given these facts, the assertion seems to be confirmed. Not to mention media criticism on how smartphones are endangering the youngsters and all users.
However, I would still think that technology is not so harmful to our creativity. In fact, technology alone can not solve our more and more conmplex problems, and humans need to intervene. For instance, smartphones and computer result from multiple decisive and milestone innovation in computer science and information technology, thanks to researchers in those fields in the past decades. Similarly, algorithms need people to implement them in the computer, and everyday computer scientists think about new ways to optimize the time of calculation for their programs. Present day technologies are not able to do this task.
Furthermore, we should also consider the term of technology through the lens of all the inventions that helped us to accomplish progress in our civilization. The wheel, the steam machine, the engines are different examples of technologies on which we relied on to develop our societies without preventing us from creating new inventions. These inventions enabled us to have more time to think and elaborate even more effective devices and processes in numerous fields.
In conclusion, our constant use of some technologies surely have detrimental effects on our mental health and our thinking processes, nevertheless, we have a major impact on the development of technology and multiple historical examples prove that rather that we depend on technology, technology somewhat relies on us to thrive.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 66
- “‘It takes a village to raise a child’. The education or your children is the task of the community as a whole, not merely the province of teachers and local school administrators.”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agre 66
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea. 58
- The following appeared in a health magazine published in Corpora."Medical experts say that only one-quarter of Corpora's citizens meet the current standards for adequate physical fitness, even though twenty years ago, one-half of all of Corpora's citizens 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... a smartphone and the suitable network. Hence the doubt casted about our independence...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, similarly, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2130.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 391.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44757033248 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05090922554 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570332480818 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.5683795603 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.294117647 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179474921387 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600514768379 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583825290075 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100788643765 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320336134093 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.