When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The technological revolution took place somewhere around 18th-19th centuries. Ever since the world has not looked back. It has played a vital role as well in human history. The impact was massive in terms of growth and productivity. Some argue that such effects are so extraordinary that it wiped out the conventional skills and lifestyles. However, I believe they would still continue to thrive by providing various alternatives to modern ways of life.
The fact that traditional skills and local livelihood are on a fade in most countries due to this technological development, is a moot issue. Although it is well known that in developed countries, old-fashioned skills are on the verge of extinction. The introduction of new and improved gizmos has replaced outdated tools and methods. To cite an example, one would seldom find manual labour and conventional methods involved in mixing concrete these days at construction sites. Unlike small-scale industries such as cotton mills and hand-weaving units formed the major part of livelihood and family income, today the whole scenario is changed. They are thriving hard to retain their position in today's tech-savvy world. Personally, my opinion is technological advancements and conventional skills both have evolved over the years.
The technology has nurtured and promoted traditional skills. Moreover, the older generations for whom it would be cumbersome to cope up with the new emerging changes should be permitted to practice or preach within their comfort zone. Several NGOs and social activists are making efforts to preserve traditional occupations and skilled workers.
In conclusion, the tradition is what we live in today. Earlier customs will be conserved and passed on to the future generations. Although new skills should be adapted to evolve and archive the old ones as and when required.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | taytaytay | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Austin382 | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | tiffanyfighting | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | aycorek | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-25 | learnafren | 84 | view |
- Some people think that human history has been a journey from igonrance to knowledge. Others argue that this underestimates the achievements of ancient cultures, and overvalues our achievements. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
- Some people think that human history has been a journey from ignorance to knowledge. Others argue that this underestimates the achievements of ancient cultures, and overvalues our achievements. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that human history has been a journey from ignorance to knowledge. Others argue that this underestimates the achievements of ancient cultures, and overvalues our achievements. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
- Biometric: A revolution in payment systems 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, so, still, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39383561644 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01631852188 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671232876712 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.353518155 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8947368421 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3684210526 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57894736842 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118687748463 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308518014497 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321360417161 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0663924239691 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00856759396331 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.39 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.