When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
As the rapid development of technology, traditions and lifestyle are being faded away. It is unimportant that they need to be preserved because of worthless. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this statement because the non-existence of culture and competencies will cause a disastrous effect on the generations in the upcoming future.
To begin with, cultures are a pride of a country, represents something which famous and interesting people can discover in this country. It seems that the way of life which are created by our ancestor is a masterpiece. Every country around the world has its own culture. They are different from others. For instance, in Viet Nam where I was born, people celebrate Tet Holiday to visit our relatives’ houses, give them best wishes and give children some lucky money. Unlike my country, many countries in Europe and America just organize a party and reunite their family to a happy New Year. It is unusual if someone gives money placed in a red envelope to children. Therefore, conservation way of life is necessary and people should do as much as possible.
On the other hand, in spite of the development of technology, the role of soft skills is very important to people, especially teenagers. When students learn the behaviour and way to live from our school and our parents, they can solve the trouble and problem. Furthermore, they will be self-reliant and needn’t ask for help. Traditional skills also make human grow up and be a person who is necessary for life and our society. For example, as the evolution of trade, the majority of children around the world have mobile phones when they are ten. As a result, they depend on their phones and can’t communicate with other people. Consequently, people must keep their life skills no matter how dependent we become on technology.
In conclusion, technology can make things easier and quicker but traditional skills and way of life are heavily influenced by our life. We ought to try and keep them alive by practical action.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | taytaytay | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Austin382 | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | tiffanyfighting | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | aycorek | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-25 | learnafren | 84 | view |
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- Some people think it is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- There are more workers working from home and more students studying from home This is because computer technology is more and more easily accessible and cheaper Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Discipline is an ever increasing problem in modern schools Some people think that discipline should be the responsibilities of teachers while other thinks this is role of parents Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that books are losing importance as a source of information and entertainment. To what extent do you agree?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...ily influenced by our life. We ought to try and keep them alive by practical action.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in spite of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99120234604 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87652940965 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589442815249 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2257766435 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.05 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237769910739 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633298040533 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469982229852 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143142436839 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310172894157 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.