the chart below show the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000
The bar chart compares the information about the lowest and the highest daily amount of two kinds of pollutants in four large cities in 2000.
Overall, while Los Angeles and Mexico constituted the largest amount of N20, the maximum level of S02 was observed in both Calcutta and Beijing in 2000. Besides, Mexico contributed the most air pollution of all four big cities.
According to the bar chart, Beijing made up 130 of max S02, which was over two times in Calcutta these accounted below 60.
Likewise, the figure for max N02 equaled in Calcutta and Beijing, at 52 and 54 respectively. Exactly one fourth of min S02 in Beijing compared to under the half in Calcutta, at approximately 50. Additionally, the min level of N20 in Calcutta doubled that of in Beijing, which the figure was about 15.
It can be clearly to seen that the level of max N20 accounted for 104, which was the half of the figure in Mexico, at 207. In comparison with Los Angeles, which the figure for max S02 was 10, the level of max S02 in Mexico was 20 times, at 200 in 2000. The level of min S02 was 199 more than that of in Los Angeles. What is more, 113 of min S02 in Mexico was triple than that of in Los Angeles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | Bennhehe | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Bennhehe | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | arsh wahid | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | arsh wahid | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | arsh wahid | 61 | view |
- The charts below compare five different countries showing the electricity used measured in megawatts or mw in a typical hospital during one week and also the number of emergency medical calls made by local residents during the same week The last chart sho 74
- the graph below shows the number of enquiries received by Tourist Information Office in one city a six-month period in 2011 67
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 75
- the chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008 83
- the charts below changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 127, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...alf of the figure in Mexico, at 207. In comparison with Los Angeles, which the figure for ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was triple than that of in Los Angeles.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, likewise, so, while, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40358744395 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39341767963 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484304932735 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5266962831 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2727272727 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179472961105 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784892324605 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088292958134 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132388468703 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102402529477 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.