Individuals can do nothing to improve our environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there is an increase in the number of people who express concern regarding environmental protection. It is a controversial issue that individuals do not play any role in this process and just only governments and large companies can do differences. From my perspective, I totally disagree with this opinion for the following reasons:
Firstly, all the policies of the government will show no effect without the cooperation of residents. Today, it is obvious that citizens have an essential influence on the decisions of the government. Although the policies could stem from positive motivation, it would fail if the government does not have the support from the public.
Secondly, all the actions of everyone could have a big impact on environmental protection because human is the key factor in this process. To illustrate, if every individual can make an effort to save energy, natural resources as well as decrease the garbage and so on, our earth will be more green and beautiful.
It is not to say that the role of governments and large companies are not necessary. With the power they have, they can set up the international standards of environmental protection or enact laws in order to not only encourage low-carbon economy but also encourage using renewable energies such as wind, hydro and solar energies.
In conclusion, both individuals and governments, companies play an indispensable role in improving our environment. In order to have the best effect, the governments and companies should give priority to raise the public's awareness about environmental protection.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-12 | dknk | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Bakhtiyar1 | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | cathylearnsrock | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | Chinkiarora | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | winiston | 67 | view |
- Total time of phone calls 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The energy use in six fields of Australian household as well as fumes which result from this process. 78
- Many people work at home using modern technology today Some people think only workers benefit from this not the employers To what extent do you agree or disagree 75
- The pie charts below show the membership by percentage of a fitness center in Oslo Norway in 2010 and 2015 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...anies should give priority to raise the publics awareness about environmental protectio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28346456693 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14472062011 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606299212598 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5208698868 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282628810594 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998311451498 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965841695683 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143635304398 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765984952638 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.