Imprionment
Nowadays, there is an increase in the number of people who express concern regarding the effective way to cope with criminals. However, it is a controversial issue that people should educate and do some job training for the offenders rather than send them to jails. From my perspective, I just partly agree with this opinion because of the following reasons.
Firstly, I strongly believe that the main function of prisons is punishing the criminals. Because individuals have to be responsible for their behavior, offenders have to receive suitable punishments for the crime that they committed. Therefore, dispossessing criminals from freedom until they feel regret for what they did is necessary.
Secondly, jails play an essential role in ensuring the public security. To be specific, severe punishment such as life imprisonment is an effective way to stop and prevent the number of criminals from appearances. For example, robbers pose a serious threat to public safety so they need to be isolated from society until they could distinguish right from wrong. Additionally, It is also the best way to calm the public opinions, especially the pains of victims.
Nevertheless, it is not to say that we should ignore the prisoner's opportunities to come back to society. In this case, educating and job training are effective tools to support them become people who can make contributions to society. However, this way is only right when they can recognize their mistakes.
In conclusion, although there are some doubts about the jail's functions, I still believe they play an indispensable role in society.
- Individuals can do nothing to improve our environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 74
- Topic: Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 56
- The elderly 61
- The maps below show the changes of a school between 2004 and 2010. Summarise the main features. 56
- The charts show women's highest education in 1945 and 1995. Summarise the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23255813953 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95280669258 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585271317829 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.686095659 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.4285714286 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.